[ad_1]
Suspects are charged with a possible violation of the inviolability of a person’s communications, threats against an official, obstruction of the activities of an investigating officer, abuse and possible illegal disclosure or use of information about the private life of a person.
This study was launched last spring. According to the Prosecutor’s Office, the data collected during the pre-trial investigation carried out by the Lithuanian Criminal Police Office officers allow a reasonable assumption that in 2020. At the beginning of 2006, in order to terminate the pre-trial investigation against one of the lawyers’ clients, an attempt was made to influence certain STT officials by informing them about the interception of confidential official data and private information about one’s personal life. of STT officials.
The suspects themselves categorically deny the allegations and claim that they only revealed the illegal behind-the-scenes activities of the STT itself and that is what is being prosecuted for that.
Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Giedrius Danėlius
G. Danėlius claimed that the STT official could have exercised illegal influence over the judges. Lawyer G. Danėlius also stated that the STT in his case in the case of the National Blood Center “served to redistribute a certain market, to transfer from one businessman to another”, that is, the Latvian businessman A. Cesas was interested in he.
The lawyers suspected of having an impact on the STT stated that the businessman A. Petrošius had received correspondence from the STT official R.Martišius.
[ad_2]
