[ad_1]
Of the 35-year-old Zimogliad, two victims were sentenced by the court to 35,000. and 20 thousand. for moral damage. The killer’s shoulders will also be additionally pressed by 9 thousand. pecuniary damage and legal fees.
Initially, this case was examined by the Vilnius Regional Court. However, the frustrated convicted murderer filed an appeal. However, the Lithuanian Court of Appeal dismissed Mr. Zimogliad’s appeal as unfounded and upheld the previous conviction.
Fatal blows
M. Zimogliad was convicted for the fact that in 2019. On May 6, around 8:55 p.m., a man was killed in a shopping center on Žirmūnų St., Vilnius.
According to the file, on the ground floor stairs during the conflict, M. killed a man by intentionally delivering an indefinite number of blows to various parts of the body of victim JD
Part of the bruising was found on the head and face areas. The cheekbone, the base of the skull, was broken in the disaster. This caused a bloodshed in the brain.
The 35-year-old man’s uncut head lay unconscious on the staircase inside the mall. Doctors were still trying to resuscitate him, but a death was found half an hour later.
People in the mall at the time reported a conflict at the restaurant between the deceased and an unknown man. They began to argue inside and then went out to the staircase, where the disaster occurred.
That unknown man was M. Zimogliad. He fled the scene immediately after the crime. Police have only made the search for the alleged killer public at that time.
Soon, Mr. Zimogliad was arrested and found behind bars. Both the mall and its entrances are equipped with many CCTV cameras. These records also helped clarify the circumstances of this heinous crime.
Murderer: I am convicted for no reason
On appeal, Mr. Zimogliad asked the Vilnius Regional Court to vacate the sentence and acquit him, as the man allegedly did not kill anyone.
According to the convicted person, the sentence of the court of first instance is unfounded and illegal, drawn up in violation of the law.
Mr. Zimogliad affirmed that the sentence appealed was based and was based on the testimony of witnesses who did not directly see the fact under investigation.
According to the convicted person, such witness testimony is only their presumptions, conjectures and subjective opinions on which their guilt could not be based.
However, the video recordings were far more eloquent than Zimogliad’s attempts to evade. Come to Zimogliad by going out the door of the mall. Then you see him approaching JD, and this backhand goes backwards.
Mr. Zimogliad tried to grab JD by the arm, but he grabbed her. Then Mr. Zimogliad waved along the side of the building toward the exit door. Moving towards the entrance shown to the mall, Mr. Zimogliad repeatedly pushed JD
When they entered the building, no other person entered or left through the same entrance. The videos show a boy and a girl emerging from a room on the third floor of a mall building, looking down through the gap in the stair railings.
When they look down, they can see Zimogliad running up the stairs from the first floor and looking into the room on the second floor of the building. Shortly after M. Zimogliad entered the room on the second floor, a security guard and a guy from the third floor landed on the first floor.
After that, several more people hurriedly descended from the third to the first floor, where, stopping at the foot of the stairs, they were obviously inspecting something. Camera records confirmed that no strangers, except Mr. Zimogliad, had climbed the stairs.
[ad_2]
