R.Karbauskis has rebels among themselves: who are they and why do they not oppose the intoxicants by the sea?



[ad_1]

The proposal to allow the sale of alcohol with a concentration of no more than 15 degrees on the beaches was supported by the “peasant” Antanas Baura. In his opinion, this prohibition is inappropriate.

“Along with the entire 2017 alcohol package (accessibility, advertising, age), the entire package, in my opinion, has been worth it and should be enjoyed.” And in this place, when it comes to seasonal coffees, little man folded stick This has been proven by practice, “the politician explained his decision.

Furthermore, he emphasized that the government sought the same.

“In this particular case, I supported the government’s opinion,” said Baura.

Julius Kalinskas photo / 15min / Antanas Baura

Julius Kalinskas photo / 15min / Antanas Baura

He stated that he had not received a pillar from his colleagues in the group on the different approach.

“It just came to our attention then. I don’t regret this step,” added the politician.

The Seimas voted in favor of the proposal on the sale of alcohol on the beaches in the last step, when the main objective was to adopt another provision: to lift the ban on the sale of alcohol in outdoor cafes that do not have a fixed place of sale. Gediminas Vasiliauskas and Aušra Papirtienė attempted to achieve this by tabling amendments.

It would be “neither this nor that” if the comrades’ initiative regarding the next proposal remains unacceptable, said A. Baura.

“I am convinced that the pending legislation will not be approved. Neither this nor that again,” said the politician.

G.Vasiliauskas: spoiled the bill

“I voted in favor because I was one of the legislators. It would be very illogical for me if I didn’t vote for my bill,” explained A. Papirtienė.

She said “it was not very good” in that allowing the sale of alcoholic beverages on the beaches was circumventing the restrictions initiated by the LVU.

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Aušra Papirtienė

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Aušra Papirtienė

“I was really in favor of the peasant and green alcohol control policy, so I supported it in all the votes. In this vote, when I voted in favor of my colleagues’ proposal to return the sale of alcohol in the beaches, I voted abstaining, so I certainly did not support it, however I voted in favor of the entire bill, commented a Seimas member.

G. Vasiliauskas, who pushed “for” during the vote, expressed great disappointment at what his project became.

“I had to climb myself, very strongly, because I am categorically against it.” I don’t think you can drink alcohol on the beaches. There are many drowning, the children end up unattended.

I was already inclined not to vote too, because a lot for me [projektą] spoiled. I am very dissatisfied with that bill, but then other cafes, where the municipal councils establish recreation and tourism areas, would also have suffered, “said the politician.

I had a great time going through myself.

Photo by Irmantas Gelūnas / 15min / Gediminas Vasiliauskas

Photo by Irmantas Gelūnas / 15min / Gediminas Vasiliauskas

V.Rinkevičius: we won’t get anything with insurance

And the Seimas “peasant”, Viktoras Rinkevičius, assured that we should not lag behind Western Europe, that it is easy to buy alcoholic beverages on the beaches, so why stand out?

“I don’t see alcohol being banned in Western Europe. I would even say there is an overly aggressive offer. I don’t think it’s very good, but still people who want to have a need should be able to go to the place so they don’t have to go to stores to bring, so of course that amount comes with a spare so you don’t run out. And when you can buy it on the spot, there’s never too much of that, but here I decide for myself, “said the MP.

By banning the purchase of alcohol on beaches, you believe that we will not reduce alcohol consumption.

“We have to do it, we do it quite successfully, I am happy about that, but after banning it on the beaches, we will definitely not achieve the goal we want,” said V. Rinkevičius.

The LVŽS faction, he said, discussed the proposal to facilitate the availability of alcohol.

The recommendation was not to maintain this, but there is no such order.

“The recommendation was not to support this, but there is no such order. There was no such thing as “you should,” said the Seimas member, adding that each member of parliament follows his mind when voting.

Rumors that the vote did not vote like the vast majority of the faction, V. Rinkevičius assured that he had not received: “No, absolutely. There were no good or bad words. I didn’t hear any evaluation or discussion after that. “

Photo by Lukas Balandis / 15min / Viktoras Rinkevičius

Photo by Lukas Balandis / 15min / Viktoras Rinkevičius

Or perhaps they voted differently, because they do not intend to participate in the Seimas elections with the “peasants”?

“I don’t know. I was never very addicted. I always decided how it seemed to me. In most cases, our positions overlapped. And where did they coincide … Not for the first time when I did not agree with the general opinion of the faction, “replied V. Rinkevičius.

Luke April / 15min photo / Virginia Vingrienė

Luke April / 15min photo / Virginia Vingrienė

The amendments to legalize the sale of alcohol on the beaches were also supported by the “peasant” Virginija Vingrienė. She said she was simply wrong when she voted.

“I was simply wrong in the vote,” he commented briefly on why he voted in favor.

If the Seimas allows the sale of weak alcohol on the beaches and again, the prohibition on the sale and consumption of strong alcohol on the beaches will continue to apply.



[ad_2]