Experts evaluate the latest party rankings: are Social Democrats drawn from the depths by Blinkevičiūtė?



[ad_1]

There is not a big difference between the parts – all the changes in the ratings compared to the previous month are within the margin of error. However, the biggest change is visible among the Social Democrats: the party would support 9.9 percent in June. surveyed and this is 2.7 percent. more than in May.

Political scientists interviewed by the tv3.lt news portal are united: this increase was determined by the newly elected party leader Vilija Blinkevičiūtė.

“They got rid of the toxic asset. I mean, Palucko. It was a gift to all other political forces, as he simply ate from the inside. socdemus – ruined, thrown over the edge. It’s over. Lithuania needs a left-wing social democratic agenda, which Paluckas was unable to deliver with his fictitious campaign, ”says political scientist Bernaras Ivanovas.

Social democrats

He highlighted two reasons for the rise in audience ratings for Social Democrats.

Supporting B. Ivanov, the political scientist Lauras Bielinis says that the rise of the Social Democrats was determined by V. Blinkevičiūtė, whose opinion, in his opinion, is good, favorable and “this somehow provoked a favorable attitude towards the leader and the The Social Democrats themselves “.

The second reason he cites is the internal election procedure in the Social Democratic Party, which has led to quite a wide debate both within the party and in society.

“There has been a lot of discussion about them: how they should behave, who should be elected. Therefore, the public has paid more attention to them, so we see that the attitude towards them has changed,” says the political scientist.

Speaking of V. Blinkevičiūtė, B. Ivanovas emphasizes that she is a person whose actions are difficult to criticize: She was able to share that with socdemais ».

“Probably the part of society that sympathizes with the social democratic side, that doesn’t really want demagoguery in the sense of state governance, but really, a welfare state, which the Presidency is only imitating. This issue is very important to the people, so Blinkevičiūtė is expected to “stretch” the party into the welfare state.

If no major mistakes are made in the future, Blinkevičiūtė could be a steam engine that will lift the party out of the deep, ”he adds.

R. Karbauskis (photo by Justinas Auškelis / Photo Day) “target =” _ self “rel =” nofollow “target =” _ blank “> A. Veryga, R. Karbauskis (photo by Justinas Auškelis / Photo Day)

At the top of the ranking is the Union of Peasants and Greens of Lithuania

Although the ratings of the Social Democratic Party differed by almost three percent, they were outperformed by the leaders: LVŽS, which would be supported by 14.8 percent. respondents and TS-LKD, who would receive slightly less support: 13.5 percent. respondents failed. The Social Democratic Party ranks third.

The advance of the LVŽS ahead does not surprise political scientists, on the contrary – being the leaders of the opposition at the top of the ranking – it is usual.

“It just came to our attention then. Negative trend conservative sense usually. But even the situation at the moment is not the best, we all understand that. Everything fell so fast and nobody was prepared. It is that factor and accelerates the fall.

But we always do the same with the parties that rule. Voters are disappointed for a very simple reason: they have too much hope, “says Ivanov.

L. Bielinis also sees two reasons here.

The first, according to him, is related to LVŽS, the second – to TS-LKD.

Farmers they are in opposition and therefore we do not associate them with the problems we face on a daily basis. With financial problems, let’s say. OR conservatives is in power. And for this reason, a society that is dissatisfied or tense with ongoing changes – economic, social, pandemic – automatically blames the ruler – the conservatives in the first place, ”he says.

According to the political scientist, the difference between the ruler and the opposition is not critical: “the delay is small, in the context of the errors, and this can be seen as a stable presence of high-level conservatives,” Bielinis added.

Conservatives, Liberals and the Freedom Party have signed a coalition agreement

The problematic road is viewed negatively by the Government

In May, 38.1% of those surveyed evaluated the Government positively or rather positively; in June, this figure reached 37.6%.

Bielinis says it’s a small drop and doesn’t think the rulers should worry about it.

“In a way, the Government should be proud that in such difficult situations, when a pandemic restricts the economy, social life, several ties are broken, we isolate ourselves, however, the attitude towards this Government is not so bad. It is more of a victory than a defeat or a fall, “he says.

According to Ivanov, a slight drop in the government’s ratings is normal, but it is strange that this rating is extremely negative.

“We have an exceptionally very high negative rating here and, if I am not mistaken, Mr. Gaidys, the director of Vilmorus, has noticed the same thing before. And that trend persists.” This is the biggest well for this government in general, I would pay attention to that, “he adds.

Some ministers say it is “politically toxic and has a very strong impact on the government itself.”

“I think toxicity is only going to increase and the government has a chance to hit the record in a negative sense. But again, a little later, in the fall. So far, they are doing everything they can to prevent that ranking from deteriorating. And there would be more than one reason: the rhetoric and the style from which society has already grown ”, says the political scientist.

Market research and public opinion company Spinter tyrimai conducted the survey from June 17 to 28. The study included residents between the ages of 18 and 75. Combined survey method used: 50 percent. by telephone survey, 50 percent. The Internet.

1,003 respondents were interviewed during the study. The distribution of study participants by gender, age and place of residence is proportional to the distribution of the population in Lithuania. The error in the survey results is 3.1 percent.



[ad_2]