Warns of changes in the leaderboards: a serious alarm call to the National Union

Why is the sediment estimate growing?

Professor Lauras Bielinis from Vytautas Magnus University (Vytautas Magnus University) on the news radio show “Open Conversation” agreed that the rising ranking of the country’s head G. Nausėda could also be associated with congratulations on the “Family March” .

I also associate the rise in the president’s rating with the fact that he has been the main subject of the list of topics discussed in the media lately. Above all it is talked about. He is both criticized and praised in various ways. All this causes a certain stir around the president and, therefore, his rating goes up, “said political scientist L. Bielinis.

The political scientist said that long-term trends in ratings depend on actual works and their successful implementation.

“It is natural that the president seeks to plan this type of thing, both in foreign and domestic policy. Not everything goes well, but there are such activities. However, in these short-term evaluations, ranking and evaluation are largely determined not by impressive jobs, but by talking about that person, ”explained L. Bielinis.

Vytautas Dumbliauskas, a professor at the Mykolas Romeris University (MRU), considered that the ratings of the country’s leader could have risen due to the public’s position.

“I suppose that President G. Nausėda has delved better into our society and the mood of our society. I think that the part of the Seimas that was quick to adopt those still debatable projects was surprised here. This has shown that our society has not yet it is mature and ready for it. And President G. Nausėda saw it and expressed the expectations of that part of society that is not prepared for such sudden changes, “said the political scientist.

V. Dumbliauskas concluded that President G. Nausėda had listened to the opinions and values ​​of a part of society.

“They are voters. With that, I also associated the decrease in the audience ratings of the Unión Patria,” said V. Dumbliauskas on news radio.

The MRU political scientist agreed that criticism and disagreement with popular opinion also helped raise G. Nausėda’s ratings.

“GRAMO. Nausėda did not take a tough position, but maneuvered more, tried to listen more to both sides,” said MRU political scientist V. Dumbliauskas. At the same time, she agreed that maneuvering between different positions was worthwhile for G. Nausėda’s qualifications.

LVŽS deprives the electorate of TS-LKD?

Recent public opinion polls should have greatly disappointed the larger Seimas faction. MRU political scientist V. Dumbliauskas spoke on the program about the crisis of this party.

“It would start with the fact that the Union of the Fatherland has been affected by an identity crisis. They do not know if they are conservative or liberal. And the propensity for liberalism is dangerous for it. This would be the third liberal party in Lithuania and not there are so many liberal voters, ”concluded MRU political scientist V. Dumbliauskas.

He said that the latest investigations had already confirmed the fact that TS-LKD was still third in the leaderboard.

“We have been talking all the time about the peasants taking the voters away from the Social Democrats. But if now the audience ratings of the Social Democrats are rising and are in second place, and the unions of the motherland are falling. This raises a strong suspicion that the peasants are beginning to draw voters from the Unión de la Patria. There is a serious alarm call here for the Union of the Fatherland, as the LVŽS will very soon take up the values ​​that are of interest to a large number of TS-LKD voters. And if the Unión Patria turns in a liberal direction, we will have such an interesting event that its voters will be absorbed by the LVŽS ”, assured V. Dumbliauskas in the program.

The political scientist said that the trend is really bad.

“As a citizen, I am saddened that there is no true conservative party in Lithuania,” said political scientist V. Dumbliauskas.

Vytautas University political scientist Magnus L. Bielinis said that the power that has become the ruling party is becoming very visible, its decisions are clearly visible.

“They are responsible for everything that happens. And today, it is natural that the situation is very complicated, a pandemic is limited by many things. And the activities of the conservatives in the Seimas, the initiatives are really anonymous, generally speaking. There is no clear strategic action ”, criticized L. Bielinis to TS-LKD.

He said that only individual politicians are visible, and true conservatives as a faction or party are not visible.

“The public does not see conservatives as a structure,” said a VMU political scientist.

He said the reason for this could be the fact that many party faces took over as ministers, including party leader Gabrielius Landsbergis.

Empty position changed

MRU political scientist V. Dumbliauskas said that the growth in the rating of the Social Democrats shows that sometimes it is enough to elect a new leader.

“Here is an example of textbook lines: we explained to the students who is the leader of the party, it is the flag. And Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, having become the leader of the party, proved that it is possible to change the position in one place fast as lightning, ”said V. Dumbliauskas.

He said LVŽS remained consistent, criticizing the ruling majority. According to the political scientist V. Dumbliauskas, the valuable confusion of the Patria Union helps.

Vytautas University political scientist Magnus L. Bielinis added that LVŽS’s ratings could be raised if President G. Nausėda is not criticized.

Recent Ratings

According to a poll published on Saturday, G. Nausėdas has a positive rating of 63.1 percent. surveyed, in May was evaluated positively by 61.4 percent of those surveyed. The second most popular politician is the new chairman of the Lithuanian Social Democratic Party, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, who was favored by 49%. (in May – 49.7 percent).

In June, the mayor of Kaunas, Visvaldas Matijošaitis, rose from fifth place in the ranking of the most popular Lithuanian politicians. It was evaluated positively by 43%. of those surveyed (40.1% in May).

Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė fell from third to fourth place in terms of popularity; in June, it was evaluated favorably with 39.8%. population. For the first time, the proportion of those who disapproved exceeded those who were positive: 41.6% rated the Prime Minister negatively. surveyed. In May, the respective favorable and unfavorable evaluations of the Head of Government represented 42.6%. and 39.3 percent.

The ruling National Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats fell to third place in terms of popularity, they were expelled from second place by the Social Democrats, the first to remain “peasants”, according to a poll commissioned by the daily “Lietuvos rytas”. by Vilmorus.

According to her, if the Seimas elections were held on Sunday, 15.1 percent would vote for the “peasants.” voters, 13.3 percent for Social Democrats and 11.8 percent for Conservatives. In May, the popularity of the “peasants” reached 16.2 percent, the Social Democrats 10.2 percent, and the Conservatives 14.8 percent.

The Liberal Movement ranked fourth among the most popular parties, with 6% of votes in favor of this political force in the Seimas elections. of respondents (6.2 percent in May), 5.2 percent for the Labor Party (4.4 percent in May), 2.9 percent for the Freedom Party (3.5 percent in May).

40 percent. respondents stated that they would not participate in the Seimas elections or that they did not yet know why to vote.