[ad_1]
Of course, it was decided to impose a fine of 400 euros on the influencer, who heard the verdict while attending the hearing remotely.
“A case of administrative misconduct has been examined, in which Monika Šalčiūtė is being held administratively responsible in accordance with the first part of article 505 of the Lithuanian Code of Administrative Offenses. The court, after examining the administrative misconduct case, heard Monika Šalčiūtė, who assumed administrative responsibility, listened to a representative of the Tax Inspectorate, evaluated all the written material in the case, i.e. the correspondence from the tax inspector, and Monika Šalčiūtė’s responses to the Tax Inspectorate is guilty of committing an administrative offense and imposing a fine of 400 euros on her, ”said Viktorija Šelnienė, judge of the Vilnius District Court.
M. Šalčiūtė was held administratively responsible for not complying with the instructions of the tax administrator; it did not react to the instructions sent by the Fiscal Inspection in October and November.
The court also rejected Monika Šalčiūtė’s allegations that insufficient information had been received on what information to provide.
“As can be seen from the electronic correspondence provided in the case, the tax inspector officer wrote emails for two months, to which Monika Šalčiūt replied initially, and then stopped responding to these letters. It was the documents that were requested. those that were not provided. According to the court, on the contrary, the communication was not insufficient, but very intense, “said the judge.
It was also decided to name the justification presented by M. Šalčiūtė in the court held a month ago as a subjective statement that the importance of this process was not sufficiently emphasized.
“According to the court, everyone must respond to the messages of the institutions, read what is written in black and white. In this particular case, it was clear what the tax office expected. It goes without saying that the tax inspection requests refer to a specific area. In this case, that is, with the accounting, with the accounting of the activities carried out.
It is understood that it may be unclear or incomplete for the taxpayer to understand the requirements, but in this case there are people who provide the appropriate advice. In the first place, the advice is provided by the tax inspection itself, and finally, you can turn to financial advisers, whose direct activity is to help people through the legal and financial labyrinths, ”said the judge.
After hearing the verdict, M. Šalčiūtė did not ask any questions and said that he understood all the statements.
Did not appear in two meetings
After failing to provide the necessary information to the State Tax Inspectorate and then failing to appear in two court hearings, the influential person first came to the hearing on June 1.
Earlier, a representative of the Communications Division of the Vilnius District Court, Delfi, stated that the hearing scheduled for May 11 had been postponed for the second time.
“Only one STI representative joined, Monika Šalčiūtė did not appear at the remote meeting. It was decided to postpone the meeting until June 1 at 1:00 p.m. It was also decided to bring M. Šalčiūtė to the next meeting, ”said the representative.
According to her, the court was unable to contact Monika at the time.
“The documents have not been returned and Monika Šalčiūtė does not respond to calls,” a representative of the Vilnius District Court confirmed to Delfi.
The previous meeting was supposed to take place on March 29, but M. Šalčiūtė asked to postpone it. The court received your request by email.
He also did not appear at the March 2 meeting, which was streamed remotely via the Zoom platform. The court then decided to postpone the case because it was thought that the social media celebrity, who had been brought to administrative responsibility, was not aware of the hearing.
The court summons were sent to M. Šalčiūtė, but it was unclear whether he received, saw and read them. In total, two reports were submitted in a relatively short time, but the court was not convinced that the aforementioned documents reached M. Šalčiūtė, because the woman did not write to any of them.
The aforementioned case against M. Šalčiūtė was initiated in accordance with Article 505 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Lithuania. 1 dty Obstruction of the exercise of rights or duties assigned to officials authorized by law, failure to comply with their legal requirements or instructions and decisions of collegiate institutions or public officials.
After the first hearing, the court representative Delphi He specified that the case was brought against M. Šalčiūtė for not presenting the documents requested to the STI for 2017, 2018 and 2019. In other words, the person did not follow the instructions. A misdemeanor of this type can result in a fine of 80 to 780 euros for individuals.
The celebrity of social networks, who was placed under administrative responsibility, was expected in court because it was intended to be questioned, thus delving more specifically into the situation in order to determine the clearer composition of said crime.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in traditional media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source.
[ad_2]
