[ad_1]
Probably the most received rating is the one enjoyed by the Social Democrats, who elected Blinkevičiūt MEP as president, which obviously significantly helped the party’s ratings.
This is demonstrated by V.Blinkevičiūtė’s personal popularity indicators.
The latest Vilmorus poll immediately placed this politician in second place after President G. Nausėda in the ranking of the most favored politicians.
We remind you that in this survey voters are asked the opinion of party leaders, members of the Government, mayors of Vilnius and Kaunas, so the MEP was not previously included in the list of politicians evaluated.
His debut is really impressive, almost 50 percent. respondents were in favor and only 17% – unfavorable.
Ironically, even the popularity of V. Blinkevičiūtė, who is the mother of all Lithuanian retirees, has remained since 2000-2008, when she, when she was Minister of Social Security and Labor, was able to comfortably comfort the poorest people. .
It is true that in 2004 V.Blinkevičiūtė sought the position of president and did not even make it to the second round of the elections, but the voters never felt hostility towards her; later she was constantly elected to the European Parliament.
After withdrawing from the political life of Lithuania, this policy seemed to have been forgotten, but it was enough for him to return to the waters of domestic politics, and a large number of people welcomed it with joy.
This is confirmed by another indicator in the survey that identifies the person that people name best represents their interests.
It is not a coincidence that this topic is called presidential electoral intelligence because pollsters themselves choose any policy without any list.
V. Blinkevičiūtė, who became the leader of the Social Democrats, also rose to the heights in this regard: 6.6 percent elected her. surveyed. She was in third place, behind only President G.Nausėda and Prime Minister I.Šimonytė.
Of course, it is too early for the Social Democrats to rejoice that their leader can win the presidential elections, as the mayor of Jonava, M Sinkevičius, proclaimed during the party congress.
In any case, the election of V. Blinkevičiūtė determined the rather sudden jump in popularity of the Social Democratic Party of 6.8 percent. in April at 10.2 percent. In May. This allowed it to position itself in third place in the ranking of parties after peasants and conservatives.
On the other hand, this ranking is not the pinnacle of the dreams of the Social Democrats, they come from above. As the Seimas election approached last summer, voters did not rate this party any worse than now: 9.1 percent were going to vote for it at that time. surveyed.
V. Blinkevičiūtė also seems to understand the fragility of the situation of the Social Democrats, who during the congress said that it is necessary to demonstrate to the voters that they are the only truly left-wing party in Lithuania.
Therefore, it is quite logical for a politician to say that the Social Democrats will not flirt with the peasants, that is, they will not rush to form a joint opposition camp with them. Consequently, it offers both to fight against the rulers and to distance itself from other opposition parties. Perhaps those tactics can also help Social Democrats regain favor with voters on the left.
But the peasants will not easily give them the positions of the dominant force on the left flank. After a good semester, they received 16.2 percent. The favor of the voters, again surpassed the Conservatives and became the most popular party, although this happened mainly because the rankings of the right wing decreased and the gap with them so far has narrowed.
Voters also appreciate the two peasant guides: former Prime Minister S.Svvernelis and even their leader R. Karbauskis, who remains one of the most unpopular politicians in the country.
The Conservatives poll may not be lighthearted, but it shouldn’t be very scary. The party’s ratings fell 17 percent. At 14.8 percent, the popularity of Prime Minister I. Šimonytė and party leader G. Landsbergis also declined, but the decline is not very steep.
The downward trend in the popularity of individual ministers is more striking. This is especially true of the conservative delegate Minister of Education, Science and Sports J. Šiugždinienė, who has now become one of the least valued politicians in the country.
This apparently reflects people’s annoyance at seeing educational strategists increasingly distracted by the transition from schools to education in touch. But if the next school year begins in the usual way, the situation may still change.
At the time, the deterioration in the evaluations of the Freedom Party’s three delegated ministers and one of its leaders, Vilnius Mayor R. Šimašius, may also reflect long-term shifts in confidence in “freedoms”.
As the pandemic subsides, people seem to be paying more attention to value conflicts. The deliberations of the Law of Association in the Seimas have mobilized a large part of society, recognizing only traditional family relationships.
Almost open support for such provisions apparently helped President G. Nausėda improve his qualifications, and the popularity of the association’s flagship, the Freedom Party, waned. This value dispute is unlikely to always be in the limelight.
