He analyzed the language of Nausėda: there were several messages, at first the stylistics reminded him of Grybauskaitė

Political scientist and philosopher Kęstutis Girnius says President Gitanas Nausėda encouraged people to meet in his annual report, but it lacked specificity.

“Language was invited to unite people, more was said about what could be achieved, less was done or not done. It was broad about everything, but rather vague, ”K. Girnius told BNS.

Compared to the language of graduating from the gym

According to him, the annual report “did little to discuss foreign policy.”

“The president is criticized for not giving a more concrete content to the idea of ​​the welfare state, but this time he spoke very vaguely that it begins with economic and social indicators and it is impossible without trust and justice. Everything is true, but there was a lack of specificity, ”said K. Girnius.

He said he believed the president could have put more emphasis on his ties to the regions and talked more broadly about political culture.

“I think he could have emphasized more his efforts to change the political culture, that the president is not omniscient and tries to live with the government, but when he cannot find a consensus, he is not afraid to veto the law, he has done it ten times” Girnius said.

“However, I think the language is weak, and partly because he is required to show some kind of leadership, although it is not very clear to me what that leadership is.” It is an encouraging language that could be more suitable for gym graduation, so your Lithuania will be interesting and good, “he added.

There is no clearer picture.

Political scientist Ramūnas Vilpišauskas says that in the annual report, President Gitanas Nausėda logically ordered the issues, but cannot form a clearer picture of the president’s own actions to achieve the stated goals.

The professor said that in the report, as expected, the head of state spoke about the vision of the Welfare State and the mobilization of politicians and social groups, evaluated the impact and response of the coronavirus pandemic, discussed relations with others politicians and mentioned key aspects of foreign policy. .

“The most important thematic things he expected in this annual report from this president are in him, the annual report corresponds to the usual genre for him,” R. Vilpišauskas told BNS.

“However, the crucial question is to what extent do the issues discussed say something new or better explain the president’s position to the public and to what extent do they show the president’s own efforts to contribute to the vision,” said a professor at the Institute of Relations. International and Political Sciences of the University of Vilnius.

He stated that some proposals, for example, to legalize electronic voting for foreign Lithuanians, turned out to be fragmentary, and the President did not explain in detail how he would try to mobilize politicians to act in strategic directions for Lithuania.

“An example is the issue of the Astrava nuclear power plant, where the statement of the situation is quite adequate, but it is not clear what the president intends to do as a mobilizer of political forces.” This also applies to other areas, ”said R. Vilpišauskas.

Saw the stylistics of Grybauskaitė

Communication expert Arūnas Armalis also appreciated President G. Nausėda’s speech on Facebook. He wrote that at the beginning of the annual report, the stylistics used by G. Nausėda reminded him of Dalia Grybauskaitė, the head of the outgoing country.

“It softened after that,” he wrote.

“The emotion was felt a lot during the first 2 minutes, in about 5 minutes the voice was no longer heard, it stabilized. But it took 18 minutes for more interesting intonations to emerge. It is true that he no longer criticized, but talked about foreign policy Which is more favorable than giving it to the Seimas when you look at the members of the Seimas, “he said.

A. Armalis noted that most of the speech is critical. “The pepper was well baked,” he said.

At the same time, the communication expert noted that although the main areas were highlighted, there was not much clarity after the annual report.

There were several messages

Political scientist Algis Krupavičius calls President Gitanas Nausėda’s annual report a programmatic language that clearly establishes values, principles and objectives.

“SOL. Knowledge of sediment is at least a few. First, that politics is a statement of values ​​and goals, so this message from the President is programmatic,” said a professor at BNS Vytautas Magnus University.

According to him, the President highlighted the importance of trust, responsibility, agreement, justice and equity in the country’s politics, mentioned the objectives of a green and innovative welfare state, spoke about phenomena and perspectives, instead of some relevant facts, individuals and institutions.

“There is something between the lines, but no arrows of annoyance or anger are buried. Finally, there is the message of creating Lithuania together and through dialogue. But have a strategy and see clear objectives, not incrementally or respond only to what is happening around you, “said the political scientist.

“The hoodie and telegraph style is gone. It was replaced by smooth, consistent, professional, and in some places critical. Journalists and policy commentators had no space to tell what and how much the president had criticized. It is the speech of a head of state with a human face. Some may disagree with him, but it is worth listening to both the public and politicians, “said A. Krupavičius.