[ad_1]
The apartment management law arouses passions. Community representatives are outraged that the Environment Ministry ignores the comments and mocks people, threatening the communities’ funeral.
Cosmetic corrections
In the spring, the Ministry of the Environment (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente) received strong criticism of the recently developed Apartment Building Management Law. An updated and better version of the bill was presented in mid-May. Representatives and residents of the communities, familiar with the new version, stood firm, without minor adjustments, the project is exactly the same, almost unchanged and the most controversial places remain.
“Not only the Lithuanian Housing Chamber (LBR), but also community associations argue that the changes are made only of a very technical nature. For example, it is stated that presidents should report not in February but in April. But the essence remains in a legal vacuum. ” community neck “, – LBR lawyer Andrius Iškauskas was surprised.
This law is corrupt and pushed through coercion.
He noted that a working group had been established to consider the original bill, but none of its members representing the public interest agreed with the bill. The document was placed in a drawer and a new one was created.
“In this way, they eliminated all the discussions and comments of the working group. They published new public consultations, although in reality all groups in society had already received the opinion. Unfortunately, there were no public comments in favor of the legislators. The Minister of the Environment has mentioned that all interested parties opinion, but we see that the comments in the current version of the law have not been taken into account, “the representative of LBR was surprised.
“There are no really significant changes. Only small details have been made and have not improved our situation in any way. The Ministry of the Environment continues to try to enslave us in our country and deprive the population of private property,” said Virginija Remeikienė, President of the Šiauliai Apartment Association.
The interlocutors indicated that nobody agreed with them on the new amendments to the law. According to them, the Apartment Building Management Law is only carried out between the Ministry and the Seimas corridor, but there is no real discussion in public.
“The ministry lies a lot and I can’t stand it. Now it is stated that the law will take effect on November 1, although before that the environment minister assured that the law will not approve this term. The housing chamber, the presidents from communities, municipalities, we all write that it will be bad, and take revenge, that only dishonest presidents fear that the law will be passed. People will definitely take to the streets because they cannot make fun of them “, V. Remeikienė was angry .
According to the presidents of the associations, if the observations continue to be ignored, the appeal to the Constitutional Court will be considered.
Community clash
A.Iškauskas is convinced that the Violated Apartment Building Management Act is like a death sentence for housing associations. It is also supported by the presidents of associations and associations.
Probably the most criticized was the legal provision on the responsibility of presidents. The bill states that if residents don’t approve of the report, the president would pay for the work done out of pocket.
“It’s not so easy to find presidents right now. That is, if a resident gets angry and disagrees with the job after the law goes into effect, the president would have to pay for it himself. Simply no one will want to take on that responsibility. , because it is not realistic for all The law stipulates that if three complaints are received, the house is transferred to others for its administration. Several institutions have also commented on a provision as possible corruption, “said an LBR lawyer.
Several comments were also received regarding the acquisition of all services through the Central Procurement Authority (CPO). Community presidents are convinced that repairing the house will be much more expensive for residents.
The public is confident that buying home repairs through a CPO will force residents to pay more.
“How can the ministry tell me that I have to clean the roof for that amount? No one will do the job for me for 100 euros. I also told the minister that I will bring one of his companies to court, whose services we buy through CPO. The minister explained to me, “There are suspicions that these elected youth do not understand what they are doing and have not lived in apartment buildings. This law is really corrupt and is being pressured by coercion, “said V. Remeikienė, who has been president of the associations for almost 18 years.
If that continues, people will definitely take to the streets because you can’t make fun of it.
Whose ears are sticking out?
The interlocutor assured that due to the growing uncertainty about whether the law would be approved, several communities were in a hurry to manage the apartment buildings. Although some work could be postponed to next year. Yes, according to the Šiauliai Apartment House Association President, inconvenience will be avoided if the law is passed.
“Since presidents really don’t run the risk of paying their job out of pocket, the house will wear out. Then a good guy will come, fix everything, and residents will become tenants rather than landlords. I think there will be people in strategic locations”. what future awaits you after the passage of the law V.Remeikienė spoke.
“It is often forgotten that apartment buildings are owned by the residents themselves. Usually, neither the state nor the municipalities have properties in them. Therefore, residents should manage their properties in the way that seems best to them and not in accordance with the will of some employees. Even the Competition Council has said that said law can restrict people’s freedom. We have repeatedly considered who can benefit from said law. Both residents, communities or presidents say they do not need such a law, it is bad. The idea is that the law will only benefit an official who can decide the fate of the apartment building “, – added A.Iškauskas.
The other community presidents interviewed also wondered what could be hidden behind the approval of said law if it did not benefit anyone. “In my opinion, there are some forces at work, someone has contributed, so this law is constantly being violated. I cannot find another explanation. Everyone is unanimous that tariffs will increase, the population will continue to be dissatisfied and the ministry will continue to press. This will definitely destroy all communities, “surprised Juozas Pukanasis, president of an association.
Didn’t you make any suggestions?
Representatives of the public do not hide that although the bill is presented by Environment Minister Kęstutis Mažeika, the so-called gray cardinal of housing policy, Ramūnas Šveikauskas, an official of the Ministry of Environment, is actually behind this work . He allegedly oversaw the work of the working groups and did much to emphasize the law.
The specialist explained to Kauno Diena that small, more technical changes have now been made to the law. It took the position that no comments were received from interested parties in the working group. According to R. Šveikauskas, the representatives of the society wanted to modify the current law and not contribute to the new creation.
“A slightly revised version of the draft was presented for public evaluation. These are more editorial corrections based on the comments received. A working group was created during the first phase. We only received suggestions from the municipalities subgroup. There were also comments from the Legal Department. We tried and evaluated. The parties – administrators and communities – did not formulate proposals, therefore, we thought that it would be possible to gather them according to the established procedure, coordinating the project “, R. Šveikauskas, the main housing adviser of the Ministry of Education , he tried to explain to the newspaper.
According to him, the working group did not clearly indicate what should be changed, but there was simply reluctance to discuss. The specialist explained that before June 10. the Housing Chamber had to present its observations. Comments will be evaluated and a public debate will be organized.
“We will see if the bill needs to be clarified more, or if it will already be possible to present it to the government. And if it approves it, the bill will be submitted to Seimas. We cannot say if the law will enter into force on November 1,” said the interlocutor. .
[ad_2]
