[ad_1]
Stasys Šedbaras, a member of the TS-LKD opposition faction and a member of the TS-LKD opposition faction, said he understood that only four of the eleven committee members belonged to the opposition factions, so they did not have the power to expect that eliminate A. Širinskienė. However, in the politician’s opinion, A. Širinskienė should take responsibility.
“The procedure is such that, if a vote of mistrust is expressed, it must still be preceded by a procedure on what might be different, since this is your group’s quota.” The president of the TTK must be from his group. If it were a waiver, at the same time there should be an offer of what else to collect, “said S. Shedbar.
The politician said the investigation, led by the temporary commission of inquiry headed by A. Širinskienė, was an unpleasant and personalized initiative.
“I think the CC decision must also be understood personally. Can a person who has carried out unconstitutional actions for a couple of years continue to decide if the projects are in accordance with the Constitution, how to implement the CC resolutions? There was an appeal. to the person’s own feelings: (…) think man, think faction, how do you see yourself? ”said S. Shedbar.
Karbauskis did not mean initiatives and calls
Ramūnas Karbauskis, the leader of the Lithuanian Green Peasant Union, did not emphasize the initiatives of the opposition.
“I can only say that today the elders of the rulers addressed the president, asking to assess whether the president of the CC is now legally occupying this position. (…) It is very difficult for me to comment on what is happening, the desire of the Opposition to eliminate our members has somehow not ended in three and a half years, it would simply have no further comment, “said R. Karbauskis.
Landsberg: This is the last “peasant” fight before the elections
Meanwhile, TS-LKD leader Gabriel Landsberg agreed with his colleague in the Shedbar faction and said that “the removal of the lieutenant chief is probably difficult to wait because the balance of votes is simply unfavorable for such a decision,” but the politician considers that the moral evaluation is very important.
“It just came to our attention then. The first one is related to the conclusion of the CC, where it assessed as unconstitutional the establishment of the Širinskienė commission and its conclusions, which also means that it is not valid. Because we know an axiom very clear and Roman that the law is not born of illegality, “said Landsbergis.
According to the TS-LKD president, the TTK chief discredits the name of a lawyer in general, “having such conclusions in his head.”
“What we are seeing today – addressing the President about Mr. Žalimas – if he is legally in charge of the CC, is an even tougher action. I would call it the last” peasant “fight before the elections to win, to fight against the CC.
We often talk about trying to slow down the public station as well. The CT with a Polish example is likely to appear somewhere on the target. This is an attack on CC. “I hope that the president does not participate in this battle, and will not succumb to such provocation, because it would already threaten the foundations of statehood,” said G. Landsbergis.
The TS-LKD President has no hope that A. Širinskienė will resign.
“I think the latest attack on KT shows that it is not only that it will not back off, but that it will fully depress the pedal and probably as long as its target is KT.” Those who said he wants to be on the Constitutional Court, I think, are wrong. She wants to be the Constitutional Court. As long as I’m not with him, that fight will continue.
She has to take her fist, press the CC so that she doesn’t have to make a decision on her own. Then the fight would probably have ended, and then the last institution guaranteeing a strong and free state in Lithuania would be taken, “said G. Landsbergis.
Širinskienė: this is despair
A. Širinskienė called the opposition’s desperation calls “in no way able to explain the transaction by Mr. Landsbergis’s wife for one euro.”
“And, in principle, those explanations will have to be proportionate, because, as far as I understand, a group of Seimas members collects signatures and will apply to ITS, since Seimas’s appeal has been declared unconstitutional. It is, of course, that Seimas members can do it individually, ”said A. Širinskienė.
According to her, there are many questions about the possible influence of the conservatives in the CC.
“Because, as we saw later, there are regular meetings with the president of the CC, where, similar to the protocols made by the conservatives themselves, potential cases of the CC are discussed, which the president himself could consider if the CC appealed. Such actions are not possible in a democratic society, ”said A. Širinskienė.
Politician sees no reason to withdraw from the TTK because the Seimas resolution has been declared unconstitutional.
“Equally, the question could be raised as to whether Kubilius should remain in politics simply because many of Kubilius’ nightly reforms, including the withdrawal of pensions in 2008-2009, savings at the expense of retirees or other Lithuanians, are hardly it was based on that period, it was declared unconstitutional. I very much regret that the conservatives, as a political force that influenced such unconstitutional decisions at that time, determined both the emigration of people and the poor life of our pensioners, they are not responsible “, said A. Širinskienė.
She does not believe that the CC’s decision prevents her from working as committee chair.
“All TTK decisions are collegial. I am pleased that the absolute majority of TTK decisions are made by consensus,” said A. Širinskienė.
The CC adopted a decision on the conclusions of the temporary commission
The Constitutional Court stated on Friday that the temporary commission of inquiry headed by peasant A. Širinskienė, which investigated the possible impact on decision-makers and political processes, was formed in violation of the Constitution, and its conclusions are illegal.
The Constitutional Court ruled that the Seimas Temporary Investigation Commission cannot undertake tasks of an incomprehensible scope, and commissions can be formed not to investigate any special issue of state importance, but only special ones.
The Temporary Commission has been working for almost two years due to possible illegal influence on Lithuanian politicians, officials and political processes. In mid-May, the Seimas approved its conclusions.
The commission carried out the investigation in three directions: clarifying the circumstances of the dismissal of Mindaugas Siauris, an employee of the Official Central Ethics Commission (COEC) and the appointment of Virginijus Kanapinskas, acting head of the COEC, and the possible role of Influencia of the Seimas members in the application to the Constitutional Court on the Accumulation of Pensions Law.
Representatives of opposition conservatives, liberals and social democrats approached the CC regarding the formation of this commission, asking to clarify whether the formulation of tasks not specific to the commission was not in principle in conflict with the concept of temporary investigation commissions and parliamentary control.
Opposition representatives argued that the commission had not formulated specific issues of state importance, so the commission could basically investigate everything that had happened in the political process for eight years.
It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, DELFI must be cited as the source.
[ad_2]
