[ad_1]
The psychologist does not doubt the need for restrictions, the lawyer calls them the most economical method of managing
The need for restraints is often questioned, and at this time, restraints are often a source of anger. However, Vilnius University, the Faculty of Philosophy, the Institute of Psychology, Associate Professor dr. Antanas Kairys believes that restrictions in human life start from the first days and are necessary, especially in such difficult situations, because people are not completely rational in themselves:
“In most cases, they do not have the best information or the ability to make the best decision in a given situation. Therefore, mutual agreements and definitions of what can and cannot be done effectively regulate our behavior. ”.
Antanas Kairys
© DELFI / Justinas Auškelis
Toma Birmontienė, a former Constitutional Court judge and professor at Mykolas Romeris University, is much more critical of the current abundance of restrictions: “Restrictions are the cheapest way to run something.” The lawyer is surprised by the most diverse restrictions.
According to A. Kairis, it is still difficult to say what affects society the most in some areas: the existing bans or the risk of infection.
Three factors that determine a person’s response to moderation
According to A. Kairis, perhaps the most difficult thing to bear, contrary to human nature, is the restriction of social contacts: “From a psychological point of view, I would probably highlight the restriction of social contacts as the most important factor in terms of of human relationships and psychological impact. Man is a social animal and needs constant contact with other people, that is our nature ”.
According to a VU psychologist, in general, the way in which people accept prohibitions or restrictions depends on several factors: the perception of the fairness of insurance, as well as cultural traditions: In the meantime, introduce the obligation to cover the The face of women as in Muslim countries would be a great resistance, since it is not our cultural tradition.
Finally, the reaction of a person to a new restriction, says the interlocutor, also depends on the extent to which it conflicts with the activities, desires and needs of a particular person: “During quarantine, we have a very difficult situation: Restrictions are often perceived as justified at the same time, very often they conflict with the satisfaction of our basic needs and the areas that are important to us. That is why we have different reactions from groups in society to the same limitations. “
People-to-People Communication After a Pandemic: Will Fear and Restraint Leave a Mark?
Can life be expected to return to a pre-pandemic pace after a pandemic? According to T. Birmontienė, it is almost impossible: “Our model of social communication should change, because now that we know each other, we do not attack each other or shake hands. There is another way to communicate, it is a little colder and at a distance ”. Even after the threat, the professor says it will continue to be a reflection of fear of illness and changes in behavior patterns.
Take Birmontienė
A. Kairys also talks about the lifestyle change: according to the psychologist, communication after the end of the pandemic will largely return to normal cancers, because a person’s natural desire to communicate, be accepted, have physical contact it is extremely strong. Meanwhile, those decisions that have been made as a result of the pandemic but have proven profitable and profitable will continue to be a constant part of everyday life:
“This is an opportunity to reduce the cost of remote meetings, perhaps by canceling part of the trip. I would like to believe that the legal limitations will disappear as soon as possible and we will maintain the most useful ways of communicating with us. “
Long-term negative consequences, says A. Kairys, can be found in the situation of women in society: In fact, it is also related to restrictions, school closings, because the presence of children at home is usually an additional burden for a woman “.
[ad_2]
