The Conservative is about Širinskienė: they are not worth your finger

Kęstutis Masiulis, the representative of the Homeland Union-Lithuanian Christian Democrats (TS-LKD) in Seimas, was surprised on Facebook that A. Širinskiene is responsible for all the most unpleasant works of the peasants.

“I can’t even imagine what Karbauskis would do if he didn’t have this Sancho Pansa – Agnė in the Seimas. He is not afraid sigh, she carries out all of Don Quixote’s blackest orders, including spying for the Constitutional Court itself. In the case of a verbal shot, she is the only one who immediately falls into the microphone and bravely covers her teacher with her chest, ”he assessed the situation.

K. Masiulis declared that “the promising faction of A. Širinskienė is not worth it.”

“She radiates some intelligence because her dictionary, unlike her colleagues, also contains intelligent words. The rest of the rest is huge, but basically vote, the faction is not worth it. They knew how to compete with each other in their luxurious jeeps and limousines and with glass eyes to sleep in the meeting room. He is afraid to say the word. This is how it exploded for four years, without understanding what it is doing here, “wrote K. Masiulis on Facebook.

Širinskienė raises questions about the president of the CC

In a press release on Monday, A. Širinskienė asked conservatives and CC Dainiai Žalimas president to explain “why meetings are being held between conservative representatives and the president of the Constitutional Court to discuss future appeals to the Constitutional Court , iy and cases that Mr. Žalimas may have to deal with as one of the judges of this Court.

“Last week, the media broadcast the 2020 media. May 1 Conservative honorary speaker Vytautas Landsbergis, member of the Seimas Žygimantas Pavilionis, energy minister 2009–2012 attended the meeting. In the Andrius Kubilius government, Arvydas Sekmokas , Herkus Gabartas and Petras Auštrevičius chaired the excerpts from the minutes.As can be seen from the statements recorded therein, conservatives, when planning a regular appeal to the Constitutional Court, can consult with the President of the Court on the content of this appeal .

According to the minutes, such a meeting of the conservatives with D. Žalimas should have taken place on May 6, and from the available documents it appears that the approval of D. Žalimas to meet was received, as well as – the communication was made before “, – A. Širinskienė.

According to her, such conservative actions and consultations with the President of the Court on future cases discredit the Constitutional Court, mention the principle of independence of the judges and are incomprehensible in a democratic state, because they invade the basic condition of democracy: the separation of powers.

“Law-abiding politicians never would, protecting the reputation of their party and, even more, of the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, it would be difficult to find a democratic country in which the president of the Constitutional Court became a private consultant to the party Article 104 of the Constitution establishes the principle of the independence of the judges of the Constitutional Court The Law of the Constitutional Court establishes that the interference of members of Seimas and other officials, political parties, political and public organizations or citizens in the activities of a judge or the Constitutional Court.

However, the prohibitions do not seem to apply to everyone, and conservatives perceive the President of the Court as a personal writer and consultant to their complaints. For this reason, I strongly urge both the President of the Tribunal D. Žalimas and the Conservative V. Landsbergis, Ž. Pavilionis, A. Sekmokas to answer questions.

How long does this “cooperation” last? What is the legal basis for such “consultation”? What conservative appeals before the Constitutional Court did D. Žalimas help write or consult? How often do they meet? Are only appeals discussed, and perhaps cases that are in the Constitutional Court are also discussed later? ”Asks A. Širinskienė.

The President of the Law and Order Commission also recalls that legal acts compel the President or judge of the Constitutional Court to immediately notify Seimas of attempts to influence the Constitutional Court, its individual judges, and announce it through the media. Communication.