[ad_1]
Nerijus Numa, main shareholder of Vilniaus Prekyba Group. Photo by Vladimir Ivanovo (VŽ)
The richest Lithuanian businessman Nerijus Numa (formerly Numavičius) can be interviewed in a study by Dutch researchers about the doubts that TAF Asset 11 would have about 26 million. Transfers in euros.
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal, which decided last year to open an investigation into remittances from Dutch company TAF Asset 11, previously linked to N. Numa, approved its plan earlier this year.
The investigation plan approved by the Chamber of Commerce of the Court in January stipulates that the conversations with the businessmen linked to TAF Asset 11, both N. Numa and other former and current shareholders and executives, must begin in February and the investigation report it must be presented to the court in July. or in August. The court also ordered the investigators to submit periodic investigation reports.
Mr. Numa’s family office does not change position and does not comment on the procedures in the Netherlands.
“As mentioned above, neither Nerijus Numa nor its related companies are involved in the ongoing investigation of TAF Asset 11, so we cannot comment on the subject of this investigation, its investigation period or plan,” Paulius Mencas, representative of the Office. he told BNS.
The TAF Asset 11 performance study covers more than six years since 2014 and was launched to evaluate transactions with the company’s approximately $ 26 million. EUR. According to a Dutch court, these funds were transferred to the TAF Asset 11 account of N. Numa and three companies of the Marcinkevičius brothers in 2009 “for tax reasons”.
According to the court, since 2014. Between the end of September and mid-November, several transactions took place, which resulted in bonds issued by Emir 77, a Polish company that currently owns TAF Asset 11, and 76.32 % of TAF Asset 11 shares previously held indirectly by N. Numa. To the Polish company Averline.
“After the transactions, the total capital of TAF Asset 11 amounts to 25.8 million LTL. Eur claims against Emir 77, without guarantees and in unfavorable conditions for TAF Asset 11 and unusual. TAF Asset 11 evaluated the value of this requirement in its 2016 report reduced to zero in the financial statements. The question arises as to what interest TAF Asset 11 could have had in the acquisition of the Emir 77 bonds, “the Dutch court ruled.
The study will assess why TAF Asset 11 chose to invest in Emir 77, which led to decisions such as the role played by Polish entrepreneurs and the country’s lawyers, the information available to shareholders of companies, as well as the role of entrepreneurs. Lithuanians in transactions. and other aspects.
TAF Asset 11 was previously owned by Bumona Holdings Limited and Miglione Investments, a Cypriot company controlled by N. Numa (76.32% of the shares), while the other share was owned by the Marcinkevičius brothers through Mindte, a company registered in Estonia (7.87% of the shares). %)., For amber – 1.97%, for Žilvinas – 13.85%).
2014 TAF Asset 11 contributed 25.8 million euros. Euro loan to Bertona Holdings Limited. The transaction was followed by a transfer of shares and accounts receivable between TAF Asset 11, Bertona Holdings Limited, Emir 77 and the Cypriot companies Averline Holdings Limited and Miglione Investments, on the basis of which € 19,783 million were transferred. part of the debt denominated in euros was transferred to Miglione Investments.
Following the assignment of part of the debt, Bertona Holdings Limited paid out € 19,783 million. Eur Miglione Investments reduced the share capital and paid the free funds to Amarentio Holdings Limited, a Cypriot company. In 2015, the share capital of Amarentio Holdings Limited was reduced to LTL 19,264 million. Eur was paid to its shareholder N. Numai.
Representatives of N. Numa previously stated that in these transactions the businessman himself lent money to the companies through the purchase of rescue shares, and a year later the loan was repaid after the amortization of the shares.
VŽ wrote that in September last year, the Chamber of Companies of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal removed the director of Taf Asset 11, restricted the rights of majority shareholder Averline, appointed an independent state official to lead it and launched an investigation into the company . activities.
The reproduction of information from the BNS news agency in the media and on websites without the written consent of the UAB “BNS” is prohibited.
Write a comment
[ad_2]
