[ad_1]
Don’t see your guilt
Returning after a completely unsuccessful mission in Sakartvele, Ž.Pavilionis was invited to explain to the Seimas, and the Social Democratic faction spoke about the fact that he should be removed from the post of chairman of the Seimas Foreign Affairs Committee. The actions of the politician were also evaluated by the Presidency.
“After the visit of Mr. Pavilionis, I am sadly forced to state that damage has been done and our image as mediators in Sakartvele has been damaged,” President Gitanas Nausėda declared at a press conference a few days ago.
Despite public criticism, Ž.Povilionis himself was convinced that he had done everything right. He stated this again in a live broadcast of the debate, discussing his visit with A. Butkevičius. In a rather arrogant tone, the Seimas explained that “we (?) Decided that the current situation in Sakartvele shows a crisis of power”, and if the President does not want to see it, it is his choice. Ž.Pavilionis also emphasized that “with representatives of all political forces, the current Sakartwell government was called upon to end the persecution of political opponents.” He himself, “speaking through the lips of the EU president,” instructed Sakartwell to separate political power from law enforcement and improve the electoral system and hold new and transparent elections urgently.
According to Ž.Pavilionis, this is what not only he wants, but also Washington and the EU behind him. Assessing the position of the President of Lithuania, he claimed that G.Nausėda and the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs had been informed about the situation, it was proposed to convene a council to solve the Sakartvelas problem, but G.Nausėda did not agree with do it and now criticizes the actions of Ž.Pavilionas.
He also did not understand why G. Nausėda and A. Butkevičius, who participated in the program, criticized him, but did not say a word to the EU leader who made similar demands.
The problem is more serious than it seems
A. Butkevičius tended to see the situation completely differently.
“It is obvious to me that this situation is a kind of conflict over the division of powers and power between the government in the election that won power in the election (because there were less than 50% of the electorate, so the issue of illegality continues being relevant) and the president.
The room for interpretation once left by the framers of the constitution now causes conflict in the relationship between each new president-prime minister. This is especially evident when people with high ambitions become leaders of the presidency on the one hand and the ruling group on the other, the signatory said. – It is obvious to me that the main instrument of Foreign Ministry policy, the Council for the Coordination of Foreign Affairs, whose functioning would ensure a unified foreign policy for the country, is not working. This became the cause of the fiasco in relations with Belarus, now it is Sakartvel’s turn, because one person seeks to shape the entire foreign policy of Lithuania. Such relationship-based activities hold the state hostage to its interests and those of its backers.
He also had criticism of the president of the country.
“It is not the power of the Constitution, but the determination of the president that determines how much one or another area of power” takes “. In Germany, the president is powerful according to the constitution, but since the time of Otto von Bismarck, the El Chancellor has been the figure of the German ship.
In France, the constitutional powers of the president are not great, but since the time of Charles de Gaulle, the powers have been realized in all spheres of state life and a similar situation has remained to this day, recalled A. Butkevičius. – In Lithuania, we had two presidents, whose historical role did not allow them to question their powers. These are Algirdas Brazauskas and Valdas Adamkus. However, the Constitution was on the table of A. Brazauskas and in making decisions he always checked whether it fell within the limits of his competence. The moral authority and internal intelligence of V. Adamkus enabled the Prime Minister and the Government to function without major conflicts. “
According to the former head of the Ministry of National Defense, the situation changed with the arrival of Dalia Grybauskaitė to power, as many elders perceived her as a usurper of power, and the “sledge”, in the words of Arūnas Valinskas, created mass on a level conflict.
“It determines that D. Grybauskaitė, as if attacking the city, had to fight for every street, house, floor. Trying to fulfill his will in power required a lot of energy and time, so the basic functions of the president were no longer said the politician – G. Nausėda is in a slightly better situation, because at the beginning of his term he did not receive as much resistance from the elite, but after trying to get out of the role of representative and start implementing a real policy, he has They have to fight for power, even in areas guaranteed by the Constitution.The two examples mentioned, Belarus and the catastrophe of Sacartwell’s policy, attest to the attempt to level the constitutional powers of the president.
Potatoes are not the ones you can point to
When evaluating Lithuania’s foreign policy, A. Butkevičius pointed out that a person with at least minimal knowledge of the political situation could not allow actions identical to Lithuania, such as the demonstrative frontal attack of Alexander Lukashenko in Belarus or the insulting Sakartvele by political leaders to call President and his government
“Although today Ž.Pavilionis, like a young child in conflict, defends that he has an older brother and a police uncle, Brussels and Washington, he forgets the crucial moment. None of the politicians from the other countries made such rude statements, but only demanded that the potatoes fix their internal situation. The current situation and the one-party Parliament is not the best instrument to defend the institutions of the entire population. This is not only the result of the actions of the Georgia Dream Party in power today, but also a consequence of highly emotional political disputes and the lack of mutual solutions, the signatory emphasized. “Accusations of dealing with the political opposition can easily be dismissed We lost the 2012 elections due to the particularly brutal treatment of political opponents. Before flying to ‘family relations’ in Sakartvele and presenting Lithuania as a defender of one of the parties, Our representatives must consult well with those who take the local situation, especially since today, neither side of the conflict has the support of the majority of the country’s population.
He also drew attention to the fact that it would be naive to believe that Ž.Pavilionis did not realize that its actions were not intended for the enforcement of the conflicting parties. “On the contrary, through his actions at Sakartvele and subsequent statements and incitement to war in Europe, he sought to create a situation in Sakartvele that would culminate in civil conflict and the resulting snap elections. I have no reason to believe that Lithuania’s interests would be protected in this way, therefore I believe that Ž.Pavilionis represents the interests not of our state, but of certain interest groups operating in the US and partly in the EU, “he said the signatory. .
Recalling the years of his work in the Transcaucasus, he highlighted the phenomenon of the region, when, after the elections, representatives of different parties had already agreed seats in parliament before the result of the elections, thus avoiding the possibility of conflict in the Street. .
“The result was deceived by the voters, but the people involved in political action do not care the least. Especially when no political party has a clear majority. The Saakashvili National Movement unites the declaratively pro-American individuals in society, whom society calls sectarians. The “Georgian dream” is more neutral on this issue, but it cannot be said that it is a pro-Russian party, “said the former head of the Ministry of National Defense explained.
He recalled that Sakartvel, unlike the GDL, which had been forcibly divided, had asked for the Russian hug.
“The Kartvels soon regretted this, but unlike the Lithuanian elite, which the Tsarist authorities rightly described as hostile, the Sakartvel elite were allowed to enter the Russian tsarist environment and very soon their diaspora in Moscow and San Petersburg became a very powerful “lobby”.
During the years of the Revolution and during the government of the Bureau, many popes held high positions, entered the field of science, were carried out in a special way. The positions of the heads of services and their relationship with Russia differed greatly from the Lithuanian, the signatory recalled another important moment. – Many potatoes made billions operating in Russia in the 1990s. I know two of them, Bidzin Ivanishvili and Badri Patarkacishvili. His political influence has been and continues to be very pronounced in his native land. Furthermore, part of Sakartwell society sees Russia as an opportunity to ensure economic prosperity. “Tourism and economic relations with the country are important for potatoes, so the brutal intimidation of sanctions through the institutions of the United States, NATO and the EU could very easily push part of the Sakartwell elite towards Russia, which has already been done successfully with Belarus. “
True, in the opinion of the politician, there is still hope that this will not happen.
“Sakartwell fears further intervention in the Russian economy and is aware that the invasion of Russia’s large economic structures would destroy national businesses. Georgia’s dream policy is also based on this attitude, but the attempt of Lithuanian politicians to turning them into Russian interests is unfounded. Let us remember that President Saartwelle Salome Zurabishvili is a former employee of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and a French citizen. ” It is very regrettable if the actions of Lithuanian politicians, reminiscent of an elephant in a china shop, would create unnecessary fears among Sakartwell’s political elite and force them to seek intercession in the arms of Russia, “Butkevičius said.
[ad_2]
