Provides an explanation for why we haven’t found aliens yet: we can become the winners of a deadly race



[ad_1]

As sciencealert.com writes, at the bottom is the so-called Fermi paradox: an enigmatic scientific anomaly because, although there are billions of stars in our Milky Way galaxy, we have never found any signs of an advanced alien civilization. Why?

This is a very interesting question. A question that has not given scientists and thinkers peace since the paradox was formulated decades ago.

Some argue that perhaps the aliens are asleep in hibernation or that there is some mystical force that interferes with their evolution. Or maybe they just don’t want to have anything to do with us?

In 2018 Alexander Berezin, an expert in theoretical physics at the Russian State University of Electronic Technology, provided an explanation of why we are alone in the Universe. He proposed, as he put it, a solution to the Fermi paradox similar to the “first to arrive, last to arrive” principle.

According to Berezin’s scientific work, which has not yet been evaluated by other scientists, this paradox has a “very simple solution that does not require conflicting assumptions,” but it can be difficult to accept because it predicts a fate for our civilization even worse than extinction. .

According to Berezin, the biggest problem with some of Fermi’s solutions to the paradox is that they describe the life of aliens in a very limited way.

“One should not be concerned with the specific nature of star-level civilization. These could be biological organisms that remind us, or something like twisted artificial intelligence revolted against its creators, or perhaps even the generalized planetary minds of which Stanislaw Lem speaks at Solarium.

Of course, even with such a broad definition of aliens, we still have no evidence that anything exists in space.

To solve the mystery of the paradox, A. Berezin argues that the only parameter that makes head turning (in terms of extraterrestrial life forms) worthwhile is the physical starting point from which we can observe them.

“The only variable that we can estimate objectively is the probability that life in open space will be captured from a certain distance on Earth. For simplicity, let’s call it “parameter A”.

If the alien civilization doesn’t reach parameter A in any way (whether it’s interstellar travel, space communication, or something else), it can continue to exist on its own, but it won’t help us solve the paradox.

Berezin’s true “first come, last served” solution suggests a much bleaker scenario.

“What happens if the first life that reached the possibility of an interstellar trip destroys all possible competitors for its further development?”, The scientist hypothesizes.

As Berezin explains, this does not necessarily mean that a highly developed alien civilization will eventually destroy other life forms, but he may “just not realize how builders destroy an anthill when they build a house because they simply have no motivation to try to save it.”

So, the Russian physicist says that maybe we are those ants, and the reason why there is no confrontation with aliens is simply that our civilizations have not yet recklessly or involuntarily destroyed the mind in an incomprehensibly superior way of life.

No. We are probably not those ants, but the future destroyers of the worlds that we have been searching so desperately for all that time.

“If we believe the above hypothesis is correct, what could it mean for our future? The only explanation is the activation of the anthropic principle. We will be the first to reach the interstellar phase. And, most likely, we will be the last to leave, ”predicts a physicist from Russia.

Again, such potential destruction of other life forms will not necessarily be planned or organized; It can function as an absolutely uncontrollable system beyond any human effort to control it.

One of the examples given by A. Berezin is free market capitalism. Another may be the danger of artificial intelligence without learning to master its potential.

“Artificial intelligence can multiply into countless copies of energy, turn all solar systems into supercomputers, and there is no point in asking why. He does it only because he can, “writes the Russian scientist.

For Fermi, the paradox is a rather frightening prospect: in principle, we can become the winners of a deadly race without even knowing that we have participated in it or, as Andrew Masterson says, “we are a manifesto created by the solution to the paradox” .

Even Berezn admits he is disappointed to be wrong, but it’s worth noting that most other scientists are more optimistic about contact with extraterrestrial life forms.

The ideas of the Russian physicist can be found HERE.

It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, DELFI must be cited as the source.



[ad_2]