[ad_1]
Discussions on the treatment of the non-sporting foul and step rule, the 3-second rule, the cylinder violation rule, the video review, and the decision change cases were discussed. Attention was also paid to the role of basketball players during the game.
“We have a database that we have 250 gigabytes of material and we already need to buy additional media. Yes, we have a list of players and we quickly recognize those who like to play (‘flop’) and this is what we discuss in our pre-match meetings. But we have to make it clear that the player who plays will have a foul to act. But also that player who likes to play would not commit a foul if he did not act.
Those “floppers” make life difficult for us because sometimes we go to the other side of the river and they don’t get the whistles that are right for them. In the long run, those players who are willing to play will eventually lose, ”said Gytis Vilius, Lithuania’s best basketball referee.
The Lithuanian Basketball Federation and the Lithuanian Basketball Referees Association seek to improve the relationship by connecting Lithuanian basketball coaches and referees to discuss and plan to hold such seminar-debates on a regular basis in the future.
During the seminar, the judges justified and explained the treatment of certain rules to generate the least possible uncertainty in the future. We have also heard trends that judges should follow. We hope this will make the work of the coaches easier and during the match there may be less room for negative emotions, ”said the head of the Lithuanian youth teams. coach Rolandas Radvila.
VIDEO: “Openly about basketball with …” | Discussion of referees and coaches
[ad_2]
