[ad_1]
“No one named there as my property belongs to me or my close relatives, and they never did,” Putin said on Monday, speaking virtually to students.
He called the report “editing and compiling.”
“In the words of one of our famous people, ‘Sad girls.’ Well, they could have thought of something else there,” the president said.
VIDEO: Alexei Navaln’s study of Vladimir Putin’s mansion
The very fact that Putin commented on A. Navalnas’ film is an indirect recognition of the legitimacy of the nation’s anger, writes Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of the political analysis firm R. Polititik.
“It just came to our attention then. But the question arises: should the nation take Putin’s word for it? <...> Without answering the question of who owns the mansion then, it seems ridiculous ”, writes T. Stanovaja on the Telegram channel.
Thousands of people came out to protest in more than 100 Russian cities on Saturday. It is estimated that up to 40,000 people could gather in Moscow alone. protesters. And the residents of Siberia Yakutsk gathered at the rally under the pressure of -52 ° C cold.
VIDEO: In Russia, Navaln’s arrest sparked mass protests: officials fought with the coups
A. Navalnas, who had returned to Russia and was soon jailed, urged people to take to the streets. At the same time, his team released a film about Putin’s ultra-luxurious palace on the Black Sea coast. However, political scientists believe that These events are just a catalyst for long-standing Russian anger..
Policy analyst Andras Toth-Czifra on his blog noyardstick.com writes that commenting on A. Navaln’s film was a deliberate change in strategy. And the fact that Putin personally thought he wanted to react to the film is extremely significant.
VIDEO: 15/15: V. Jurkonis: The Russian regime is still deciding on the actual imprisonment of Navaln
According to A. Toth-Czifra, in public comments, V. Putin opposes his credibility. And the fact that this was done very soon after the film’s release means that the president expects the situation to get worse.
Navaln’s comrade, Leonid Volkov, has already asked the Russians to take to the streets this Saturday as well.
According to Toth-Czifra, the Kremlin does not yet have an answer on who, if not Putin, is the owner of the mansion, but it does send a signal that someone from the elite should shoot the president.
Alexander Korobko, who is writing the biography of Putin, is already in a hurry to claim that this may be a gift from Russian billionaires to the president, which he has not yet accepted.
A study posted on Navaln’s blog and a two-hour video posted on YouTube before he returned to Russia say the property is worth $ 1.35 billion. dollars (1.12 billion euros) and that the “largest bribe in history” was paid.
The study says that the estate on the Black Sea coast includes a casino, an ice rink and a vineyard.
It claims that the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) owns around 7,000. acres of land around it and that the complex was financed by Putin’s close allies, including Igor Sechin, who heads the country’s largest oil industry group, Rosneft, and billionaire magnate Gennady Timchenko.
“It just came to our attention then. And Putin is the only irreplaceable czar in this country,” Navaln says.
[ad_2]
