[ad_1]
“On Sunday evening, I decided to return to Vilnius from my home in Dūkšte. Monday is a working day. However, there is only 50 kilometers of fuel left in the gas tank and the question:” How about an empty refrigerator? “- A. Širinskienė started the story on the social network.
She assured him that she hadn’t been able to go shopping, because Thursday’s session of the Seimas lasted into the evening, after which she immediately went home, and then driving control was introduced, but she still thought that the man in risk would not go to eat all week.
“He didn’t drive in the spring and he hasn’t driven in a month. We just don’t want to risk seeing what the supermarkets are like. So it all ends with the fact that before I go to Vilnius, I will go to the nearest gas station in Visaginas, and at the same time I will buy food there.Especially around 9 pm, when the traffic control on the roads will be reduced and movement will be freer before the work week.
8 pm 50 min. I am at the Visaginas border. Although the workday of the position is coming to an end and the police position will be retired soon (as it was when I returned), the policeman is stopped. “Maybe you will at least let me buy fuel?” She has enough objective reason. Fuel is added quickly (20 hours 55 minutes, as shown on the receipt from the gas station). And on the way I stop at the local LIDL, already at 9 pm
The store is almost empty, so I toss the essentials and quickly into the checkout. On 08.21 the check is drawn and … the police are already waiting here.
The store is almost empty, so I toss the essentials and quickly in the box. The 21.08 is made the check and … the police are already waiting here. It turns out they think that he no longer had the right to buy food after fuel. So “we will definitely inform our management and you will probably be invited to a survey.” My attempt to explain that I have to buy food for a man is insufficient for them, ”said the Seimas member.
She says she will be happy to take the survey and answer any questions.
“Including the reasons why I buy food for my husband at Visaginas and we can discuss whether buying food for an at-risk person who does not go to supermarkets himself is an objective enough reason to visit the store after buying fuel,” he indignantly .
The Seimas member claimed that under current procedure he could not return home at all, although he lived in Dūkšte for the rest of his life, except for the year of study, and had no property here.
“Our house was inherited by our mother and we do not see the need to ‘rewrite’ that property in any way. During my studies, I declared my place of residence in Vilnius. It was also convenient at work, so the need never arose to declare residence again. I have not returned home to the declared place of residence since March. I am protecting my Mother and we find other ways to communicate. I have always thought that my private life is my own and the police or the state will not have to explain. It seems I’m wrong, “he says.
A.Širinskienė explains that “with that logic of a paramilitary state”, which was approved by the rulers last Sunday, to her family’s house in Dūkšte, which has been my home since 1975. When she was born, she would not have been able to come .
Monday’s changes, made by the government after turning the stick on Sunday, allowed “other objective reasons” to leave the municipality of the declared place of residence. So, he allowed me to go home from Vilnius to Dūkštas. I hope that the desire to return with the spouse at least on the weekends is an “objective reason”. I wanted to believe that buying food, in my circumstances, not in the municipality where you have declared your place of residence and where you do not have property, is an objective reason to move. Especially when you buy food for a week at risk even for someone who belongs to several factors.
Unfortunately, I was probably wrong, because, as I experienced today from the police, shopping is only possible in the municipality of your declared residence, even if that municipality is about 130 kilometers away, and the person who will eat the food is right here ” wrote A on Facebook. .Širinskienė.
“I don’t know how far we’ll go with such a perception of state governance, but I’m very hopeful that the stinging restrictions won’t end up putting people at risk in stores just because someone didn’t think through all of life’s situations and tried to assess to all people when preparing a government resolution. under a shoe, “he resents.
Still, last week the Police Department made it clear that people may not be able to go shopping in another municipality.
Ramūnas Matonis, Head of the Communications Department of the Police Department, assured that when buying, residents should think carefully: the officers probably will not get lost, as it is not a necessity.
For her part, Božena Zaborovska-Zdanovič, an advisor to the Strategic Communication Division of the Ministry of the Interior, said that it is not forbidden to leave your place of residence and go to the point of sale.
“Of course, it is recommended to choose stores in the same municipality where you live, but if you cannot, you can go to a store in another municipality. The police officers will assess each situation individually, but, as already mentioned, the objective is not to sanction, but to explain, as well as to encourage people to become aware and reject unnecessary trips, ”said the representative of the Ministry of the Interior.
VIDEO: The great road control begins in Lithuania
[ad_2]
