The United States Supreme Court has rejected a complaint from the state of Texas about the presidential elections



[ad_1]

The lawsuit, which seemed unlikely to be successful, was voted on in four major states: Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where Biden won the Nov.3 election.

However, the Supreme Court, which has nine members, three of whom were appointed by Trump, said that Texas, in which the current president won, “has not demonstrated a legally recognizable interest in the way the elections are conducted. in another state”.

VIDEO: After winning the office of US President, Joe Biden addressed his compatriots, vowing to unite the divided country and fight COVID-19.


The ruling is “an important reminder that we are a state governed by the rule of law, and while some may give in to one person’s wishes, the courts will not,” Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel wrote on Twitter. .

Biden’s spokesman, Mike Gwin, said the ruling “was not a surprise.”

“Dozens of judges, election officials from both parties and Trump’s own attorney general have rejected his baseless attempts to deny that he lost the election,” Gwin said.

Many considered the Texas lawsuit to be forceful and without legal basis because no state has the right to interfere in electoral processes in other states. However, the complaint was backed by 106 Republican lawmakers and attorneys general in 17 states.

Texas claimed that the election results in the other four states were “unconstitutional” because large numbers of voters expressed their will in a “tamper-proof” manner by voting by mail in the wake of the coronavir pandemic.

VIDEO: The US Presidential Election System: What Is It Like And Why Can You Turn Your Head?


The state did not provide any evidence of significant falsification, nor did it contest the results of the vote-by-mail in the states where D. Trump won.

The lawsuit cited many examples of implicit fraud, which had previously been rejected by lower courts.

However, Rudy Giuliani, D. Rump’s lawyer, said the allegations were “serious.”

“It just came to our notice then. They can’t just be dismissed,” the former New York mayor told Fox News.

White House spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany told Fox News that the court had “escaped” and “hid behind the process.”

Following the ruling, President Trump wrote on Twitter that the court had “disappointed us” and accused him of “lack of wisdom and courage.”

But perhaps the strangest reaction was that of the chairman of the Texas Republican Party, who strongly condemned the Supreme Court ruling and seemed to hint that it would be worth it for him and other states to secede.

“It is good for law-abiding states to come together and form a union of states that abides by the constitution,” President Allen West said in a statement.



[ad_2]