[ad_1]
Marius Mikalauskas, Saulius Vaškys, Ina Pupšienė and Mindaugas Radavičius were charged with committing crimes. The court has been investigating this case for more than two years due to the abundance and variety of crimes, the concealment of M. Radavičius, as well as the epidemiological situation in the country.
The case was charged with criminally acquiring automobiles while acting in a group of accomplices, as well as stealing, falsifying vehicle identification numbers, documents, selling automobiles, or preparing to commit criminal offenses: kidnapping foreign property and falsifying vehicle numbers. vehicle identification, acquisition and maintenance of false official marks, falsified real documents and made, produced and performed false documents, knowingly participated in commercial activities, robbed an apartment.
M. Mikalauskas was charged in the case of the commission of 137 crimes, M. Radavičius. – for 66 acts, I. Pupšienė – for 4 acts, S. Vaškys – for 9 acts.
When sentencing Mr. Mikalauskas, the court took into account the fact that he had not been previously convicted, he was administratively sanctioned, the duration and scope of the commission of criminal offenses, the versatility of criminal offenses and the availability of tools and instruments for the commission of crimes. All of this testifies to the fact that committing crimes against property had become their livelihood and way of life. During the investigation and the trial, he avoided testifying, offering it only for the part that was based on evidence. The evidence was delivered, in principle, only to the investigating judge for a more lenient pre-trial detention. Such conduct of M. Mikalauskas during the judicial process, in the judgment of the court, showed that he was not inclined to critically evaluate his behavior, did not show the desire to change his criminal thinking and lifestyle.
M. Mikalauskas was convicted of 12 misdemeanors and 22 misdemeanors. He was sentenced to a cumulative sentence of 4 years to 9 months in prison in a correctional facility. During 19 episodes he was acquitted without proving his involvement in the commission of these crimes. For the victims M. Mikalauskas. you will have to pay damages worth 11,067 EUR. The unjust enrichment funds confiscated for the benefit of the State amounted to EUR 30,595.60. Unjust enrichment includes the proceeds of crime, including proceeds of crimes for which the victims have not filed or abandoned the claim.
In convicting S. Vaškis, the court took into account the fact that he had not been convicted before and had been administratively sanctioned. He was found guilty of a misdemeanor: forging car identification numbers. He was fined almost € 3,000. S. Vaškys was acquitted of 8 crimes without proving that he participated in the commission of these crimes.
I.Pupšienė acquitted of the 4 episodes that were presented to her without proving her participation in the commission of these crimes.
During the examination of the case due to the fugitive M. Radavičius. the case was dismissed, the man was detained after the court had already entered the decision room, so the court would make a decision on him later.
The judgment can be appealed to the Klaipėda Regional Court within 20 days from the date of its publication by filing an appeal through the Klaip Ayuntamientoda City Council of the Klaipėda District Court.
[ad_2]
