[ad_1]
The accident described in the media more than once due to strange police decisions occurred on November 1, 2014. Varėna district, Valkininkai sen., 1 km from the Naujieji Valkininkai – Daugai – Alytus highway. During his time, businessman Justinas Valašinas, born in 1980, while driving an Audi Q7 SUV, passed a column of at least seven cars and made a first and final left turn in the column to make a Toyota Avensis. During the accident, a 10-year-old girl driving a Toyota, daughter of the driver Jurgita Jankauskienė, was seriously injured and later died in hospital.
The accident situation did not raise doubts for the officers who arrived at the scene: the official report on the incident recorded that the accident was possibly caused by an Audi Q7 driver who turned at least seven cars and collided with the back of J’s car. Jankauskienė. On that basis, a pre-trial investigation into the car accident was launched, naming a possible culprit: the driver of the Audi Q7.
The second blow awaited the Jankauskai family, who buried the only son of the accident, when the prosecutor Regina Juškevičienė, who was leading the investigation, reported the suspicion to J. Jankauskienė, and her husband, Vaidas Jankauskas, became in the only victim in the case.
According to J. Jankauskienė’s lawyer, Gediminas Milevičius, accused of causing the accident, one of the main proofs of the guilt of his defendant are the conclusions of the experts of the Lithuanian Forensic Science Center (LTEC), but they are more than strange .
“When analyzing the findings of various expert reviews, one gets the impression that even when new circumstances are clarified, the data in the computer simulation program tends to change in such a way that the speed of Audi does not increase and remains as it is. they allow road signs, “says Milevičius.
The first expert examination was carried out even by an expert who did not have the necessary qualification: transport transology, and several significant errors were recorded in him. For example, instead of Audi’s own weight (2370 kg), the expert entered 2990 kg (the maximum weight of a fully loaded car) in the computer program. The LTEC expert also wrongly claimed that the Toyota car had fallen and stopped 8 meters from the edge of the parking lot, when a site visit and distance measurement revealed that this distance was at least 18 meters. “It is clear that this 620 kg ‘excess’ weight and the reduced flight of the car from the crash site gave the expert a significantly lower speed of the Audi (93 km / h) than it actually was,” commented the wife. Vaido, who was recognized as the victim in this painful case. Representative of Jankauskas S. Survila.
A study by an independent expert gave Audi a much higher speed of at least 125 km / h before the accident. With this in mind, the court ordered additional expertise to determine Audi’s speed, but LTEC experts again concluded that the SUV’s speed did not exceed 95 km / h.
Last year, police officer Arūnas Puodys, who had carried out the initial investigation of the traffic accident, also spoke during the trial. According to a former official quoted in the media, he was pressured to rewrite the original protocol up to three times to favor the Audi driver, and after a while the man was forced to leave the service.
On Tuesday around 5 pm, the judge of Var juena Loreta Janiulytė announced that J. Jankauskienė was acquitted. The judge also made the decision to request the Kaunas Regional Prosecutor’s Office to open a pre-trial investigation to determine whether J. Valašinas, who had been a witness so far, was not guilty of the tragic accident.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to cite DELFI as the source.
[ad_2]
