[ad_1]
“I couldn’t help but ask the Prime Minister a hypothetical question, you decide, Prime Minister. Can a minister who took 10 percent.” Rebound ” (illegal income tax – aut. past) for renovation projects, to be responsible for allocating hundreds of millions to roads and other investment projects, ”G. Landsbergis asked the Prime Minister.
For his part, S. Skvernelis saw in the words of G. Landsbergis the slander of the Minister and declared that he would have to answer legally.
“I just want to say now, dear colleagues, that the opposition leader has accused a minister of corrupt practices and, in a word that is perfectly understandable to them, of taking ‘rebellions’. It is for these words that he must take and respond in a legal sense. I think the Minister of Transport and Communications will do it, “said S. Skvernelis.
Mr. Landsberg soon wondered why the Prime Minister was reacting in such a way to a hypothetical question.
“Prime Minister, don’t you think his reaction to this and a hypothetical person’s defense in general is about well-being? A person handles your well-being first, and then yours? Prime Minister, don’t you see any connection here?” Asked the opposition leader.
“I see more connections here when one or another hypothetical person uses state property to organize their commercial interests. There are hypothetical people who can buy plots for one euro or relatives who receive gift plots in general. This is hypothetically very incorrect,” he replied. S. Skvernelis.
Accused of slander
The prime minister also received a question from conservative Jurgis Razma about the paving of the road leading to the prime minister’s house. However, according to S. Skvernel, if a crime has been committed in this matter, it must be decided by the police.
“Now you are taking and accusing the minister of possible illegal actions. Let’s not argue, sir, okay? That’s the first. The second, or is it a fairy tale from start to finish, or is it a report and knowledge of a possible crime In any case, the end result must be legal.
Either the tale must be responsible for defamation and the spread of false knowledge or, if it is a criminal offense, the police must investigate the possible abuse 12 years ago and prosecute it, “Skvernel said.
The Prime Minister also secured access to his home by paving personal funds.
“Stop lying one way or another. Slander and lies are constantly spreading. I don’t exclusively use Lithuanian roads, none. I paved the entrances to my private home on my own. And stop lying once, dear Jurgi Razma, “said S. Skvernelis.
Charges on the way
President Gitanas Nausėda expressed mistrust towards J. Narkevičius in late November, but the minister refused to resign and the prime minister decided not to grant his removal to the head of the country.
S. Skvernelis has been criticized for the authorities’ decision to allocate an additional 300,000. In late October, the Government allocated additional funds to the Vilnius district, and the municipality decided to pave a part of the street inhabited by the Prime Minister for them.
The Chief Commission on Official Ethics launched an investigation into the reconciliation of J. Narkevičius’s public and private interests at the end of last November, and completed it in January of this year.
S. Skvernelis states that it did not influence decisions on the asphalt of the road. It also ensures that the publicly charged charges against J. Narkevičius have failed.
J. Narkevičius has also been criticized for the paving of other roads in the districts where the Polish Lithuanian electoral campaign he represents is in power: the Union of Christian Families, the circumstances of the dismissal of the Lithuanian Postal Board and residence in a Seimas hotel.
Reproduction of information from the BNS news agency in the media and on websites without the written consent of UAB “BNS” is prohibited.
[ad_2]
