When discussing the fate of Lukiškės Square in the Seimas, not only are they discussed but also hinted at erotic fantasies.



[ad_1]

Arūnas Gumuliauskas, president of the Parliamentary Commission for the Freedom Struggles and the Historical Memory of the State, presented the bill in Lukiškės Square in the Seimas Chamber.

According to him, the preparation of amendments to the law was stimulated by the memory status of Lukiškės Square defined by law, and the principles of its management were established.

Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Moment of the event

Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Event moment

Therefore, according to A. Gumuliauskas, the LGGRT, owner of the Museum of Occupations and Freedom Struggles near the square, is considered not to be the proper administrator of the Vilnius City Municipality.

Photo by Sigismund Gedvila / 15min / Arūnas Gumuliauskas

Photo by Sigismund Gedvila / 15min / Arūnas Gumuliauskas

Lukiškės square with the museum would form a common memorial space, which could include the nearby closed Lukiškės prison.

A. Armonaitė, partner of the mayor of Vilnius Remigijus Šimašius, by whose decision a temporary beach was installed in Lukiškės square, noted that in recent months the Seimas has been considering the third bill that regulates what the square should look like Lukiškės.

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Dawn Armonaitė

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Dawn Armonaitė

“I’m already beginning to think that Lukiškės Square is a kind of erotic fantasy from Ramūnas Karbauskis, its leader, without which he cannot, releases press releases every other day and keeps finding new ideas about what should be in it and how handle it, “he said. .

I’m already beginning to think that Lukiškės Square is some kind of erotic fantasy from Ramūnas Karbauskis, your leader, without which he can’t, releases press releases every other day and constantly finds new ideas about what should be in it and how to handle it .

A.Armonaitė asked why R. Karbauskis did not table the amendments.

“Dear Dawn, I really am a historian, not an eroticist. And since I am a historian, it is very important for me to have such a square in the capital of the Republic of Lithuania, it is very important for me that it fulfills the functions of a commemorative square. And why, if not a historian, present this project ”, answered A. Gumuliauskas to the parliamentarian.

Opinions differ

Conservative Arvydas Anušauskas explained that so far everyone has finally sought to build a monument to the Freedom Struggles in Lukiškės Square. He emphasized that this was the goal, rather than seat management issues.

When a monument to the partisan general Žemaitis was erected alongside the Ministry of National Defense a quarter of a century ago, according to A. Anušauskas, no one had the idea to first remove the land and then build a monument there.

He also mentioned that LGGRTC has erected a thousand monuments at the sites of the guerrilla deaths. “There was also no need to nationalize the plots and hand them over to the center. Is that why this empty politics instead of adequate solutions and finally the construction of the Monument to the Freedom Struggles? ”A. Anušauskas asked.

Photo by Lukas Balandus / 15min / Arvydas Anušauskas

Photo by Lukas Balandus / 15min / Arvydas Anušauskas

A. Gumuliauskas said that he believed that if the plot is given on loan, it is not nationalization. “The term ‘change of governor’ would be more appropriate here than nationalization,” said a representative of the “peasants” of the Seimas.

MP Linas Balsys said he did not agree with Lukiškės Square becoming a representative square of the Lithuanian state.

According to him, it is not uncommon for the old market square to become a central place. He asked why isn’t Independence Square near the Seimas, not Vincas Kudirka or Cathedral Square is seen as the main one.

A. Gumuliauskas replied that previously market places were the main ones in many cities.

Seimas Povilas Urbšys member spoke in favor of amendments to the law, according to which the management of Lukiškės square would be transferred to LGGRTC.

Addressing his fellow parliamentarians, he asked to show at least one self-respecting state that would allow him to pour a beach in his representative square, to show the mayor of the capital that he would not understand what a representative state square is.

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Povilas Urbšys

Sigismund Gedvila / 15min photo / Povilas Urbšys

“Those who are now talking about the independence of the municipality, I would like to remind you: until 2012, this square did not belong to the municipality of Vilnius.” In 2012, he appealed to the Government to immortalize the memory of Lithuanian freedom fighters in Lukiškės Square, ”said P. Urbšys.

In his opinion, it can be seen that the municipality of Vilnius city does not care about this perpetuation.

“I care about rest, freedom, irresponsibility and the show of valuable buttocks against the places where our nation’s heroes were tortured and killed. This is a necessary defense. It’s really bad when you have to pass the law to be Vytis. It is bad when it is necessary to take a place in a municipality and hand it over to a state institution, but there is no other way ”, P. Urbšys is convinced.

I care about rest, freedom, irresponsibility and the display of valuable buttocks against the places where the heroes of our nation were tortured and killed. This is a necessary defense.

He spoke before the Seimas session

Before the plenary session of the Seimas, R. Karbauskis told reporters that the working group formed by the Ministry of Culture had decided that the provisions of the recently approved law on Lukiškės square would be included in the loan agreement with the municipality from Vilnius city.

However, the president of the Seimas Culture Commission explained that, in the opinion of politicians, this would not change anything.

Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Ramūnas Karbauskis

Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Ramūnas Karbauskis

“Because the city of Vilnius is run by people who have a history of legalizing drugs in their election programs. Apparently it is a moral expectation that their attitude towards the square changes … Apparently that will not change, so the decision in this The case would be to hand over to LGGRTC to manage this square. This decision must be formalized by law, and in that case the discussion on whether to amend the agreement with the Vilnius municipality or not with him will simply be recovered “, said the leader of the” peasants ”.



[ad_2]