[ad_1]
V. Mirzajanov is a chemist who was the first to reveal information about the existence and development of Novičiok. In an interview with Russian television Dozh, he said he wanted to apologize to Navalno after Germany stated that it had “conclusive evidence” that Novičiok had poisoned him.
Navaln issued a message Saturday describing his symptoms after Aug. 20, when he was poisoned. A. Navaln still has difficulty speaking, has trouble filling up with water or using the phone. However, opposition politicians are already walking.
“I would like to sincerely apologize to A. Navalno for participating in this criminal activity, creating this material with which he was poisoned,” said V. Mirzajanov, who currently lives in the United States, who wrote the first articles on Novičiok in the 20th century. . On the 10th of December.
Meanwhile, Leonid Rink, another scientist who created Novičiok for state media controlled by the Russian Kremlin, claimed that A. Navalnas had not been poisoned by the substance.
So far, three scientists who created Novičiok in the Soviet Union have spoken publicly about the poisoning of A. Navaln.
According to V. Mirzajanov, A. Navalnas should make a full recovery.
‘A. Navaln must be patient, but in the end, he must recover, “said Mirzajanov, who predicted that the recovery would take” almost a year. “
He stated that the poison had likely entered Navalno’s body through the mouth because other people had not been poisoned.
Meanwhile, another Novičiok scientist, Vladimir Uglev, told Projekt that Navalnas had survived because he only had skin contact with Novičiok.
Navalno’s comrades collected items from his hotel room in Tomsk and sent them to German experts, who found traces of Novičiok on a bottle of water.
Speaking to the Russian state media, L. Rink criticized V. Mirzajanov. According to L. Rink, V. Mirzajanov was just an “ordinary” chemist who did not directly contribute to the creation of “Novičiok”.
“It has nothing to do with the creation of Novičiok,” Rink said, adding that Mirzajanov could not have known the “biological effects” of the substance.
L. Rinkas claimed that if A. Navalnas had poisoned Novičioku, he would have died.
“It would not have survived if it had been Novičiok,” Rink told the Kremlin-controlled media.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of ELTA.
[ad_2]
