Yun Suk-yeol’s offensive turn … “Preparing for the demand for disciplinary cancellation”



[ad_1]

Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who returned to his office in accordance with the court’s decision, began preparing a lawsuit to cancel the two-month disciplinary provision. Earlier, in the stay of execution case, the court decided that there was a problem with the disciplinary committee’s procedure and decided to return to President Yoon’s office, but the lawsuit to cancel the disciplinary provision is developed separately. On the 27th, Mr. Yoon’s lawyer, Wan-gyu Lee, said: “(In the decision to cite stay of execution), the reason why the court analysis document could be abused is inappropriate, with the premise that it was created for the purpose of attacking or defaming the court and distributed to a third party. ” Additional.

They also expressed their intention to proceed with the lawsuit to cancel the disciplinary action as soon as possible. General Yoon said, “We will cooperate as much as possible so that the lawsuit to cancel the disciplinary action can be completed in 4 months.”

[정희영 기자]


Chu Mi-ae wakes up from the silence “I realized that I must come that day”


Break the silence and trust social media for reform
Deal with the nuclear power plant investigation for the second day

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, who expressed his appreciation after requesting disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, posted an article on his SNS that was interpreted as a new emphasis on his willingness to reform the prosecution. Minister Chu wrote on the 27th: “Although I knew that the day would not come easily, I also realized desperately that the day had to come.”

On the other hand, in the lawsuit filed for the two-month suspension of the disciplinary provision, Yoon stated that he would actively clarify the purpose of the analysis document by the court and the allegations of interfering with the prosecutor’s office, Dong-hoon Han. General Yoon went to work on the 26th after the 25th and received reports of major investigations, including suspected manipulation of the economic viability of the Wolseong nuclear power plant.

On the 27th, Mr. Yoon’s attorney, Lee Wan-gyu, said, “We will faithfully clarify the process of drafting and distributing the analysis papers for the court.” Furthermore, regarding the charges of interfering with the prosecutor’s office by the chief prosecutor, Han Dong-soo, said: “The court said there was space to call a call, but this did not admit to interfering with the office. of the prosecutor.

General Yoon went to work at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul at 2:30 p.m. on the 26th and received a report of the investigation of important cases, including the suspected economic viability of the power plant. Wolseong Nuclear Power from Deputy Attorney General Nam-gwan Cho. However, it was reported that the progress of the investigation during the suspension period was primarily reported and the investigation was not specifically targeted. They also checked the status of job readiness for changes in the criminal justice system and ordered additional measures.

Meanwhile, the chairman of the disciplinary committee Jeong Han-joong (professor at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies School of Law), who decided to be suspended for two months with President Yoon, expressed dissatisfaction with the court decision. President Jeong posted a post on his SNS on the 26th, saying, “I am very sorry for the court’s decision” and said, “I had a lack of understanding of legal ethics.” He then argued that “the standard of legal ethics is not only to engage in inappropriate behavior, but also to refrain from suspicious behavior.”

[정희영 기자][ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

[ad_2]