South Korea-United States-Japan-Korea-China conference mentioning ‘North Korea’s nuclear program’ … Will the situation on the Korean peninsula change?



[ad_1]

© News1 Designer Il-Hwan Kim

Amid the emphasis on the North Korean nuclear issue and peace on the Korean peninsula at the meeting of the three security offices of the ROK, the United States and Japan and the meeting of the diplomatic ministers of Korea and China , the focus is on whether the situation on the Korean peninsula will change in the future.

In particular, it is noteworthy that the North Korean side, which would have been closely watching the Korean government’s diplomatic activities, has yet to respond to such a reaction.

Blue House National Security Officer Seo Hoon held a face-to-face meeting with White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Japan’s Director of National Security Shigeru Kitamura at the Naval Academy nearby from Washington DC on the 2nd (local time).

According to a statement released after the meeting, the three countries shared concerns about North Korea’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs and vowed to resolve these issues through cooperation among the three countries for denuclearization.

Director Seo Hoon said in a meeting with correspondents after the meeting, “Korea, the United States and Japan agreed on the urgency of North Korea’s nuclear issue and the need for a diplomatic solution, and agreed that efforts for the early resumption of the United States- Negotiations with North Korea should continue.

On the 3rd, immediately after the meeting of the heads of the security offices of Korea, the United States and Japan, a meeting of the foreign ministers of Korea and China was held in Xiamen, Fujian, China.

At the beginning of the talks, Wang said that “China wants to seek a political solution to the Korean peninsula through dialogue with Korea.”

When Minister Chung said, “Our government is calling on the Chinese government to continue to play a constructive role so that the stable management of the situation on the Korean Peninsula and the peace process on the Korean Peninsula can make substantial progress,” Wang said. also, “We will actively cooperate as much as we can.” It is known that he promised.

Despite the acute conflict between the United States and China, the United States and China did not discuss or agree directly, but the Korean government’s diplomatic activities appear to have created a consensus as a matter that the United States and China must resolve first. the North Korean nuclear issue and peace on the Korean peninsula.

It is also noted that North Korea would have waited for a message to North Korea, monitoring the diplomatic situation of the Korean government.

However, it is true that the North Korean nuclear issue was implicitly emphasized, as the North Korean nuclear issue was mentioned in the meetings of the ROK-US security officials. And Japan and the meetings of the diplomatic ministers of Korea and China.

North Korea is more likely to move in accordance with the US administration’s Biden policy toward North Korea, which is expected to be announced in the middle to the end of this month, rather than a response to the government’s diplomatic activities. from South Korea. North Korea previously proposed the “Gang Dae-gang Line” principle, saying to withdraw its hostile policy toward the United States.

Yang Moo-jin, a professor at the North Korean Graduate University, predicted that “North Korea is unlikely to respond well to the announcement of the results of the Korea-US-Japan security bureau meeting alone. and it is more remarkable how the United States will publicize its policy towards North Korea. “

Considering that North Korea is waiting for the United States to announce a new policy towards North Korea, and that China, which maintains close relations with North Korea, emphasized dialogue in talks with the South Korean government, North Korea should refrain from provoking armed forces such as missile launches in the near future. There’s a possibility.

However, the possibility of criticizing the Korea-US-Japan security chiefs meeting through propaganda means, such as ‘submissive diplomacy with the United States’ or ‘follow-up diplomacy’, cannot be ruled out, on the same level as Korea. del Norte has previously criticized.

In this situation, advice arises that the South Korean government should continue with balanced diplomacy in order to prepare a breakthrough in future changes in the situation on the Korean peninsula.

Professor Yang said, “The government should take steps to inform North Korea of ​​the results of the Meeting of Heads of the Security Office and the Meeting of Korea-China Foreign Ministers, so that North Korea can become a a forum for dialogue “. “He stressed that the ‘balanced diplomacy’ of the current government must continue, he said, and said:” We must not let go of communication until the end to do this. ”

[email protected]



[ad_2]