[ad_1]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeolThe second interrogation will take place on the 24th of the request for a stay of execution, which was filed by attorney general Yoon Seok-yeol against the disciplinary action of ‘two months of honesty’.
The Twelfth Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Deputy Judge Hong Soon-wook) will open the second interrogation date for the stay of execution requested by Yoon against Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae at 3 p.m.
It will take place two days after the date of the first interrogation on the 22nd, and as soon as this day, the fate of President Yoon can be decided. If the judge accepts the request, President Yun will immediately return to office, and if removed, President Yoon must remain suspended for two months.
The cross-examination is usually conducted in such a way that the court hears the opinions of both parties and then seeks additional explanations on the matters necessary for the trial. In addition to the requirements for stay of execution, it is expected that the questioning on that day will address the main complaint requesting the cancellation of the disciplinary action.
In the questionnaire sent to both parties after the court proceeded with the first interrogation of the stay of execution, five of the seven questionable elements refer to the motive or procedure of the disciplinary action.
These are the issues specifically addressed in the main lawsuit, not the requirements for stay of enforcement in the context of ▲ irreparable harm ▲ urgent need ▲ public welfare.
In particular, it is known that there is also a specific question in the questionnaire asking to explain the arguments about the reasons for the disciplinary action of President Yoon, such as the court analysis documents and interfere with the investigation and investigation of Channel A.
Between them, in the case of ‘Analysis Papers for the Court of Justice’, the position of President Yoon and the Ministry of Justice is a sharply divided issue, so fierce battles over content are expected on the second questioning.
As to whether the disciplinary process was legal, the arguments on both sides run parallel and it is expected to occupy much of the questioning.
Yoon is expected to actively protest the illegality of the disciplinary procedure, including the training of the prosecutor and the disciplinary committee. On the other hand, Minister Chu is expected to emphasize that the suspension was carried out legally through presidential approval.
Furthermore, President Yoon’s side is expected to repeat the existing position on the requirements for stay of execution, such as undermining the neutrality of the prosecution and violating the rule of law.
It is also noted that the Ministry of Justice will continue to argue that Yoon’s return to work for disciplinary reasons will seriously threaten public welfare.
Given that the number of sentences handed down by the judiciary has increased, there is the possibility that the interrogation on this day will last more than two hours, as in the first interrogation.
The listing or dismissal is expected to be released as soon as tonight or shortly after Christmas, but there is also a chance that the hearing will last longer than a week or two.
[연합뉴스]
Copyright ⓒ Yonhap News. Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited
