Yoon Seok-yeol’s “Proceed to a lawsuit regardless of Chu Mi-ae’s expression of resignation”



[ad_1]

[사진출처 = 연합뉴스]

picture explanation[사진출처 = 연합뉴스]

It was assessed that the disciplinary committee decided a weaker disciplinary action than expected in consideration of public opinion during the two-month suspension of the prosecution and discipline committee of the Ministry of Justice. Yoon said he would pursue the lawsuit regardless of whether Minister Chu expressed his gratitude to President Moon.

At 4 am on the 16th, Jung Han-jung (Professor of the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies School of Law), acting as representative of the disciplinary committee, △ distributed analytical documents to the court △ interrupted the inspection of the Canal case A △ The investigation related to the Channel A case was interrupted. I judged it was accepted. On the other hand, △ Inappropriate exchanges with media owners △ There was a problem with the suspected breach of the obligation to collaborate with the prosecution, but it was decided not to use it as a reason for disciplinary action. △ The leak of surveillance information in the Channel A case △ The interference in the surveillance of the case of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook was due to lack of evidence. It was decided.

“I decided today because it was undesirable to put off unpleasant things for a long time for people suffering from Corona 19,” Jung said. He said: “There were a lot of opinions, like six months and four months of honesty and firing, so I discussed it for quite a while.” General Yoon replied, “I see that the procedure is underway and I think it was already set up.”

Although the dismissal was discussed, it was assessed that the two-month suspension was weaker than expected. Disciplinary gender-based punishment, such as cuts and reprimands, was expected to be severe because it was not a justification to explain the push from the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae. Some pointed out that the disciplinary committee felt a political burden and judged Yun’s charges to be weak. Immediately after the disciplinary decision, Jung said, “I will receive the public reprimand against Yang.”

General Yoon, who came to work that day, instructed the National Prosecutor’s Office to respond to the spread of Corona 19. General Yoon said: “To ensure that there is no obstacle to the livelihood of small business owners and homeowners of small businesses, actively use prosecution and refrain from subpoena investigations. ” In addition, President Yoon prepared and distributed ‘Explanatory Materials to the People’ in connection with the prosecution adjustment. President Moon did not comment on the two-month suspension. However, General Yoon said, “We will continue the proceedings regardless of Minister Chu’s announcement.”

Before expressing his appreciation, Minister Chu said in a joint briefing on the reform of the institutions of power: “In the new criminal justice system, not a ‘trial by trial’, but a ‘trial of the people’ looking at just the people and realizes the justice they want. “I’ll let it go,” he said, revealing his willingness to complete the reform of the prosecution. The new criminal justice system refers to the enactment and application of amendments to the Police Law, such as the amendment to the Air Transport Law and the establishment of a national investigation headquarters.

[박윤예 기자 / 정희영 기자][ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

[ad_2]