[ad_1]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who was unable to go to work due to the decision to exclude the post of Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae, addresses the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on the 1st. Yoon was unable to go to work after the Minister Choo Mi-ae’s order to exclude duties (on the 24th of last month) and reached the government building as soon as the court decided to temporarily suspend the effect. Reporter Lim Hyun-dong
President Moon Jae-in’s “ two months of honesty ” disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol (16) on August 24, when the court immediately suspended the application of the court’s disciplinary effect, and the parties of the opposition showed a strong temperature difference.
Through the comments of the day, the Popular Power made an official position that “we welcome the judicial ruling. Jun-young Bae, spokesperson for the People’s Power, “The court’s verdict prevented the provocation of the ‘deformity of the prosecution’ with the mask of reform of the prosecution.”Said.
In opposition, criticism of the regime that led the discipline of President Yoon continued. In a call with JoongAng Ilbo on this day, Ho-young Joo, the representative of the People’s Power, said, “It is a natural result and a natural judgment.” “Now President Moon, who has rigged the ridiculous disciplinary action from behind and approved it again, must speak up and apologize to the people.”He insisted. Oh Shin-hwan, former member of the Future Integration Party, also said, “It’s really a comeback to life” via Facebook. “President Moon and the Democratic Party want to commit a deadly crime before the people and Minister Chu immediately abandon politics.”Said.
Hong Kyung-hee, chief spokesperson for the National Assembly Party, also commented, “We welcome the wise decision of the Boruin Court on ending the rule of law.” Former lawmaker Tae-seop Geum said: “The wind direction changes. Little by little, the world that was going crazy began to find its place, “he wrote.
In addition, the Democratic Party criticized the court decision head-on. Democratic Party chief spokesman Choi In-ho said: “We express our deep regret that the judgment of the judiciary did not adequately reflect its seriousness.” “I am concerned that this ruling undermines the stability of the administration and creates mistrust in the judiciary, intensifying the division of national opinion.”He insisted.
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae is on the morning of the 21st to work at the Gwacheon Government Complex in Gyeonggi Province. When the court accepted President Yun’s request for suspension of disciplinary effect, opposition to Minister Chu’s resignation arose. Newsis
A member of the Democratic Party leadership also said, “It was an unexpected decision,” and said: “In terms of the amount of discipline, two months of suspension was not excessive. There are many parts that I don’t understand. ”
However, there was the view that some in the party ordered a cautious approach. In a call with JoongAng Ilbo that day, a key member of the Democratic Party said: “The discipline of President Yoon must be seen separately from the reform of the institutional prosecution.” I’m going to. “A registration-oriented legislator said:” There was a lot of prospect that there was a problem with procedural legitimacy, so it was very likely that he would be cited. ”
On the other hand, on the day President Moon’s decision to stay home was suspended, Cheong Wa Dae’s spokesman Kang Min-seok said, “The court’s decision was issued at a late time” and “Today there is no announcement of the position of the Blue House. ”
Reporters Kim Hyo-seong, Son Kook-hee, and Ha Jun-ho [email protected]
[ad_2]
