[ad_1]
Additionally, Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Mi-hyang said on the 14th that prosecutors announced the results of the investigation stating that they were prosecuting him without custody. Representative Yoon also said, “The prosecution again criticized the grandmother of the comfort women victim.”
Representative Yoon said that day, “I apologize for causing concern to people with my case,” but he refuted in detail the charges that the prosecution brought against him. He said, “I will prove my innocence at trial.” He also said: “I will do my best to overcome the national crisis and will be true to my role as a member of the National Assembly in the future.” Like when the suspicion first arose, he expressed his position that he would keep the office as is. The opposition party noted that “there are eight counts that include embezzlement and defiance of Representative Yun, and it is a shameless attitude to deny that it is not unconditionally true.”
Representative Yoon said in a statement on the afternoon of the day: “The prosecution insisted that I used an account in my personal name to collect (the consolation women donation) as commercial embezzlement, but all the funds raised were used for public purposes. “. “Not.” On the suspicion of ‘receiving illegal government subsidies’, he said: “We receive and execute the subsidies in accordance with established procedures.” The prosecution believes that Representative Yoon received various grants for fraudulent application and used 100 million won collected for personal purposes.
Defendant Yoon said: “The prosecution is ignoring grandmother’s mental and physical subjectivity”, regarding the charges of “near fraud” that her grandmother Gil Won-ok, a consolation woman victim of severe dementia, donated the ‘Prize Women’s Human Rights’ to Eui-yeon. “We have to take responsibility for the allegations that comfort women are abused again.”
Representative Yun said it was “not true” and “has gone through due process” for his allegations, but did not provide concrete evidence. He said: “The announcement of the results of today’s investigation cannot destroy the 30-year history and cause of the movement to solve the problem of comfort women.”
The Democratic Party did not take an official position at the party level on this day. Chief spokesperson Choi In-ho met with reporters and said, “Because (defendant Yoon) was prosecuted, if there is anything that can be taken under the Party Regulations (I will discuss it).” A Democratic Party official said: “Because Representative Yoon is not in charge and the trial results have not been obtained, it is not easy to immediately take disciplinary action.”
Democratic Party lawmakers who actively defended Congressman Yoon at the time of the ‘suspicion of donation misappropriation’ were also silent that day. In May, when suspicion against Congressman Yoon was first raised, Democrats argued that “pro-Japanese, anti-human rights and anti-peace forces are launching an offensive to discredit the movement to correct the truth of history.” Representative Kim Doo-gwan, who said, “The elected Yoon Mi-hyang, who dedicated his life to the long journey of finding the historical truth of comfort women, should not be manipulated as an embezzlement of public money,” said: “I will observe (the results of the trial).”
The Justice Memoria Solidaria also kept silent on this day. I did not open the front door or answer the phone. Meanwhile, Eui-Yeon Jeong argued that most of the suspicions that the media raised against them and Representative Yun were “a malicious and distorted report.” The report in this magazine last June that money was lost from Gil Won-ok’s account to organizations related to Eui-yeon was “a report tainted with ‘illegal’”, and on the 8th, “Eui- Yeon was seriously damaged by false facts. “For the reason, he said that he filed a 100 million won damages claim with this magazine. However, Eui-yeon Eui-yeon did not respond to the report that day.
