[ad_1]
A civic group that indicted a member of the Democratic Party, along with Yoon Mi-hyang, submitted a petition to the National Tax Service asking it to confirm the couple’s allegations of tax evasion.
On the 22nd, a civic group (Saxon-mo) bar exam preparation meeting announced on the 22nd that it had received a petition from the National Tax Service asking the National Tax Service to confirm the allegations of tax evasion. of Rep. Yoon and her husband, Kim Mo. In this petition, Sa Jun-mo replied, “Regarding the suspicion of tax evasion by Congressman Yoon’s partner, the Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office said: ‘No there is a crime of embezzlement in companies, and the National Tax Service has the authority to determine whether tax evasion has been assessed. “
The suspicion of tax evasion by Yoon and his wife was raised on the 14th when the Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office announced the results of the investigation against Representative Yoon Mi-hyang. At the time, the Western District Attorney’s Office indicted Yun without imprisonment for embezzlement of subsidies by the Justice Remembrance Association (Euiyeon Jeong). As for the reason for the non-persecution, it was confirmed that the actual family income was higher than the reported annual income, and the daughter’s school expenses, estimated at 300 million won, were mostly covered by the property of Congressman Yoon. and the criminal compensation of Mr. Kim. It’s because it’s done. “
However, the fact that “actual household income was higher than reported annual income” was again controversial. In May, the opposition party announced that the total income tax paid by Yoon and his wife over the past five years was 6.43 million won. Based on the amount of the income tax, Yoon and his wife’s combined annual income was estimated to be about 50 million won, and the problem was how to pay for the daughter’s school fees, which would have reached hundreds of millions of won. Dollars. The Western District Attorney’s Office announced that “as a result of the investigation, the income of Congressman Yoon and his wife exceeded the reported amount.”
Consequently, the suspicion was raised that Yoon and his wife did not get out of income tax by reporting less income than they actually were. When asked about the position by a media outlet, the Western District Attorney’s Office said, “In fact, there was more revenue, such as advertising expenses from a local newspaper run by Mr. Kim, and revenue from Congressman Yoon’s lectures, than reported income “. “The tax authorities were accused of tax evasion. It should be possible to investigate.” Sa Jun-mo’s side cited this in the petition, saying: “I hope the National Tax Service will review the respondents’ allegations of tax evasion and collect additional taxes if confirmed.”
In May, when suspicions about Eui-yeon’s patronage began to mount, Sa Jun-mo filed a complaint with the prosecution against Yoon, who was elected at the time. At that time, Sa Jun-mo was charged with accusations such as ▲ Eui-yeon’s accounting opacity, which is less than that of a college club, ▲ Incorrect accounting details, ▲ Yoon’s husband’s job at the company.
