[ad_1]
7 years 5 months. It is the time it took for the elderly comfort women victims to claim damages against the Japanese government and accept the “prevailing judgment” in court on the 8th. This long period of time was mainly attributed to the constant response of the government. Japanese to the stage, instead of acknowledging responsibility. Lack of cooperation from the Korean government and cooperation from the judiciary also hampered rapid progress. Meanwhile, 7 of the 12 manuscripts, grandmothers, closed their eyes.
It was in August 2013 that the late grandmother Bae Chun-hee and others demanded compensation from the Japanese government. It was the first time that a legal procedure of a Korean court had been carried out instead of a Japanese court. Before the formal lawsuit, the grandmothers filed a request for civil mediation, stating, “Refund 100 million won per victim.” Civil mediation is the resolution of disputes by agreement between the two parties on the recommendation of a judge or mediator, and the procedure is relatively simpler than a lawsuit.
However, the Japanese government closed its ears at all. The Hague Convention for Notification of Cases (Article 13), which establishes that the notification of dispute documents may be denied in cases where the sovereignty or security of the country itself is considered to be violated. Kang-won Kim, the attorney for House of Sharing, who represented the grandmothers, also sent a letter urging then-President Park Geun-hye to “actively cooperate in civil mediation,” but to no avail.
Finally, in October 2015, the grandmothers requested a formal suit change. In January of the following year, the case was entrusted to Section 34 of the Civil Settlement of the Seoul Central District Court. However, Japan’s refusal to serve was another obstacle. Furthermore, ‘Yang Seung-tae’s judiciary, which only paid attention to the government, was a problem. At the time, the fact that the judicial administration had drawn up a report to the effect of “ dismissing it or dismissing it for the termination of the claim ” in relation to the comfort women lawsuit was revealed by the Nongdan judicial investigation in 2018 .
As a result, the first trial took place in April last year, more than four years after the formal lawsuit began. Three months before this, it was possible because the court decided to post on the court notice board the purpose of the documents to be delivered to the Japanese government.
There were ups and downs in a total of four allegations. It was difficult to organize data to support the claim that “ in the case of comfort women, exceptions to the theory of state immunity (sovereignty) must be admitted, ” but last year, the spark of “ Suspicion of embezzlement of donations from the House of Sharing ” came to the demand. Even the ‘variable’ occurred. When the House of Sharing workers resigned, it was a series of difficulties to secure the specific data needed to prove the damage.
The lawsuit, which had no promise of when it would end, concluded on the 8th with the ruling of the first trial that “the Japanese government is responsible for compensating the victims of comfort women. On day 2,706 of the request for civil mediation, it was a monumental conclusion that our judiciary raised the hand of the victims.
Jooyoung yoon reporter [email protected]
You can also watch the Naver Et news edited by Hankook Ilbo.
Issues that may interest you
[ad_2]