[ad_1]
It is controversial that there was no holiday registration in June 2017, which became a problem among the suspicion of the holiday preference of the son of the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae.
Although the opposition party insisted that it could not admit that it had taken a vacation without records and data, the lawyers of Minister Chu’s son were verbally approved and refuted that there were interview records in the comprehensive solidarity administration system. In addition to the medical certificate from a private hospital, the reason why the medical certificate or file from the Armed Forces Hospital (Yangju Hospital) could not be presented and the objection that it was submitted to the prosecution was opposed. The objection is that there is an unfair suspicion that such a vacation is possible for ordinary soldiers and that it is a vacation that has been legally approved orally.
On the morning of the 9th, CBS radio ‘Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show’ appeared on CBS radio ‘Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show’ and National Power Councilor Hyun Geun-taek’s lawyer Jeon Ju-hye and son from Minister Chu.
Regarding the absence of vacation records, Representative Joo-hye Jeon said, “During the military period, all vacation records are accurately recorded in the Military Manpower Administration, and related data is also saved in the military base. “There is no data left in the sick leave record I went to,” he criticized. “As there is no data, it is not clear if I went through the legal process and left on sick leave.” The former legislator said: “It is not easy to admit that the usual procedure has been carried out because there is no data.”
Attorney Geun-taek Hyun said, “It doesn’t seem to be a part of us to be involved in what is not in the military records.” “I don’t know exactly why the records remain, and because we publish the medical records, we get sick leave based on that. I think there is no problem,” he rebutted.
Regarding the release of medical records, the current attorney issued a statement stating that Seo had surgery on his left knee before going to the military, and that right knee surgery is also required at Seoul’s Samsung Hospital on April 5, 2017, before going to the first sick leave. He explained that he went to the first sick leave based on the results of treatment at the Yangju Armed Forces Hospital. Later, during the first sick leave, on June 8, the right knee was operated, and the medical certificate said that 3 months of treatment (treatment) was required.
Why not present the medical certificate from the Armed Forces Hospital
In addition to the medical certificate of the Samsung Hospital in Seoul, the fact that the medical certificate of the Yangju Armed Forces Hospital was not disclosed also became a problem. “The most important data on sick leave from June 5 to June 14, which is the first sick leave, is the medical certificate received at the Yangju Armed Forces Hospital,” the Clinic said. “Medical certificate from Seoul Samsung Hospital from April 5 is necessary,” he argued, but it is not possible to apply for sick leave immediately. “Doctor Jeon said,” There must be a medical certificate from Yangju Armed Forces Hospital. , but it was not disclosed, “he said.” It was the case that there was no record of sick leave from June 5 to June 23. “
Hyeon Geun-taek, a lawyer, refuted that “the content of the Yangju Armed Forces Hospital contains information that it requires sick leave for 10 days and is sent to an investigative agency,” and that it was not disclosed to the media.
Representative Jeon Joo-hye said, “In the case of the Yangju Armed Forces Hospital, you can get the certificate again if you go, but it is possible to get it again and spread it abroad.” Said. In response to host Kim Hyun-jung’s questions about whether he or she has no intention of disclosing it, attorney Hyun Geun-taek rejected, “I don’t know if the legislators request and receive Yangju Hospital, but it is unlikely that they will. let us voluntarily disclose to the media. ” In this regard, the former Clinic said: “We request the Yangju Hospital, but we are not giving it.”
“There are interview data in the holiday related communication (collective data), oral approval”
The attorneys contested that there was interview data in the chronological integration data between the vacation records. Lawyer Geun-taek Hyun said, “There is no vacation record, but it is said that there is interview data in the connection, that is, the consolidated data. did. There was no order of personnel, but since it was said that there was order, we believe that there are no procedural problems ”.
Representative Jeon Joo-hye said, “The integrated solidarity system consists of entering the content in the interview journal, so we cannot say that the sick leave itself is legitimate.” “We never cooperate on this part.” “I can’t believe it with just words,” said the former legislator, arguing: “It’s like ‘yes, there are interview records’ about this part of what was written in the integrated solidarity administration system.”
Do you follow US military regulations or army regulations?
It is also a problem if Seo’s vacation, who was a KATUSA soldier, follows the USFK regulations or the ROK Army regulations. Lawyer Geun-taek Hyun told PD Kim Hyun-jung’s question whether the KATUSA soldier’s license is an American military rule or a Korean rule, “it applies to both.” It is said that the Army Chief of Staff is said to be the Army Chief of Staff, but he explained that, in the KATUSA Soldiers Regulations, ‘when you go on vacation like this, you follow this procedure.’ The current lawyer argued: “That is why both regulations apply, but the claim that only Army regulations apply as explained by the Defense Ministry is clearly wrong.”
Representative Jeon Ju-hye refuted, “The Ministry of National Defense is responding that the Korean Army permit (regulation) system applies.”
Is the oral approval valid?
It was also a problem if the oral approval process was valid. Representative Jeon Joo-hye argued, “Shoe approval, this itself is not on the record at the moment, so I think this itself has not been done normally.”
Lawyer Hyun Geun-taek said, “Of course, verbal is the priority for orders in the army or everywhere,” he said. “The basis of the order must remain, but we cannot blame ourselves for not having it.” The current lawyer insisted: “In the case of vacations in the army, a personnel order is issued, but in wartime, the battalion commander documents the order or verbally.”
Faced with criticism from the host that it is not an exhibition now, the current lawyer said: “It is the same for normal time (normal time)” and said: “I give permission, I am going on vacation, then it will take effect at that time , and the filing of documents is a later matter. ” did. The current lawyer said: “It is possible verbally and there is no verbal approval. So it doesn’t make sense,” he said.
“I heard that you will be granted sick leave if you submit the documents after handling personal leave” “Is this possible in the ROK military?”
In particular, on the question of whether the documents were delivered late on June 21, the current attorney said: “Based on the fact that I checked the general log book, I contacted them around 14-15, before end of the first vacation. He explained: “We handled it like a personal vacation until the documents were sent later.” That is why it is argued that there are no procedural problems. When asked by PD Kim Hyun-jung who said it was okay to send the documents late, the current lawyer replied, “I know it’s from the unit’s side.” The current lawyer also said, “Since Mr. Seo tried to ask the doctor who is judging whether or not to extend sick leave, we treated it as sick leave because the doctor was on vacation at the time.
Representative Jeon Joo-hye said, “Now I’ve admitted that what you’re talking about is a tremendous privilege.” “I just said that I would take personal leave and asked for an extension. If I present a medical certificate, will I have the next sick leave?” “Is this a possible story for the ROK Armed Forces?” He criticized. Representative Jeon pointed out, “I am still talking about this not being possible if it is an ordinary family child.”
Attorney Geun-taek Hyun said: “When the second extension was done, the doctor was on vacation and in the case of personal vacation, KATUSA Soldier’s policy says that he can go whenever he wants. “It’s going to be sick leave,” he rebutted, saying, “it’s too much to say it’s preferential treatment.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
