[ad_1]
Enter 2020.12.28 20:56
Edit 2020.12.28 23:05
“My country daughter contributed a lot to the thesis”“The person in the video is the daughter of the country”“I saw my motherland daughter in front of Dongyang University”
It should be noted who is a witness to the suspicion of perjury while Professor Chung Gyeong-shim, wife of former Justice Minister Cho Kook, was sentenced to four years in prison at the first trial. This is because the judiciary explained that there were witnesses who perjured Professor Jeong, explaining the reasons for the judicial arrest. The judge said: “There were cases in which several people close to the canonical court gave false testimony different from the facts of the accused in this court.”
Witnesses suspected of perjury include Professor Jang Young-pyo of Dankook University School of Medicine, Choi Seong-hae, his nephew, Dongyang University president Lee Mo, Jang Kyung-wook, Professor of Dongyang University and the Secretary General of the Center for Human Rights in the Public Interest of Seoul National University, Kim Mo. These are the witnesses who testified in favor of Professor Chung.
On the 28th, at the sentencing of Professor Chung’s first trial, the court contrasted his statements with objective evidence and the statements of other witnesses, pointing out that his testimony was false. Professor Jang, who listed former Minister Cho’s daughter and his wife as the first author of his medical thesis, actively defended Professor Jeong, including that Cho’s contribution to the thesis was greater than that of a researcher who trained Jo in the method of gene amplification (PCR). Meanwhile, I heard a reprimand from the judge saying, “Is the witness a lawyer?” The judiciary said, “Cho did not have the ability to do PCR on his own without receiving guidance from Mr. Hyun,” citing the testimony of a professor at the Catholic medical school that “it is difficult for medical students to do PCR. “.
Regarding whether Mr. Cho actually volunteered at Tongyang University, Seonghae Choi, former president of Tongyang University, testified that he had witnessed Mr. Cho’s own visit to a cafe operated by Tongyang University. in August 2012. Professor Jang Kyung-wook from Dongyang University also stated that “I heard another professor say that he had witnessed Mr. Cho’s volunteer work.” The judge said that when looking at the details of Mr. Cho’s credit card at that time, only the details used in Seoul were found, but the details used in Yeongju, Gyeongbuk, where Dongyang University is located. Lee dropped the point when he saw Mr. Cho, and the court pointed out: “Because you can be punished for perjury, think carefully and respond.”
In the case of Secretary General Kim, the woman in the video from the center’s conference in May 2009 stated that she was correct as to whether she was an intern at the Public Interest Human Rights Law Center. It is said that I remember seeing Mr. Cho at a conference with chest-length hair and horned glasses. The judge said: “Since Kim has not seen Jo’s face for about 10 years, it is hard to believe the claim that she was able to recognize that she was the same person as Jo by looking at a woman’s profile in the video. Said.
To be punished for perjury, it must be shown that there was a perception that witnesses made false statements. According to the precedents, a false statement refers to the statement of an experience against memory.
The prosecution usually initiates an investigation for perjury immediately after the first instance sentence. An official from the investigation team said, “I will do the part that needs to be investigated.”
