[ad_1]
When the son of Attorney General Choo Mi-ae bought a vehicle, it was discovered that he established a joint participation with a disabled father in a ratio of 99 to 1. It was pointed out that the actual vehicle is a “trick” for the son to borrow your father’s name while driving to enjoy various benefits for the disabled. Lawyer Seo Seong-hwan, husband of Minister Chu’s husband, is known to have a disability to the point of a slight limp in a car accident.
The power of the people According to Assemblyman Do-eup Kim’s office, Minister Chu’s son, Mr. Seo, 27, bought a K5 (1999cc) vehicle last year with his father under the common name. The stake was 99% from Seo and 1% from the father. According to Congressman Kim’s office, his son Seo posted his father’s name on the representative owner of the vehicle and described him as “not severely disabled, exemption from public debt” in the Vehicle Registration Agency special matters. On the other hand, even though the vehicle was jointly owned by Mr. Seo’s father, the father’s name was not on the insurance policy.
In response, Congressman Kim raised the suspicion that “the reason the parent with the disabled registration card dared to purchase 1% of the vehicle was to avoid various auto-related taxes through the benefits of the disabled”. According to the Law on Social Welfare for the Disabled, the individual consumption tax, the employment registration tax and the car tax are reduced or exempted when a person with a disability purchases a vehicle of less than 2000 cc.
Representative Kim said: “According to the Local Tax Act, if a person with a disability who has been named as a joint name is transferred after one year from the date of registration of a vehicle, the acquisition tax will not be charged. exempt. It can also have a tax saving effect if it is transferred to. “If the acquisition of a family share from one to 99 is for the purpose of saving taxes that undermines the legislative purpose, then Minister Chu is not qualified as the head of the Ministry of Justice.”
This issue was a suspicion that was raised before the Minister’s staff hearing in December, but according to Assemblyman Kim, the Minister at the time is known to have failed to adequately cooperate with the request for data submission. At the time, Minister Chu said in a reply to Kim’s office that it was “a family vehicle used by the son to take her spouse to the hospital.” Stated.
