[ad_1]
On the 31st, when the top doctors decided to continue the strike indefinitely, a specialist staged a picket demonstration in front of the main building of Seoul National University Hospital in Jongno-gu, Seoul. Seoul National University Hospital decided to reduce outpatient internal medicine treatment for a week from that day, as the burden on teachers became heavier due to a strike by leading doctors and full-time physicians. 2020.8.31 / News1 © News1 On the 29th, when the agenda to stop the group action (strike) was rejected, the controversy between the main doctors about the result of the vote grew. There is no procedural problem that the majority doctors say they want to stop the strike and the voting schedule has been rejected.
It was concluded on the 30th that more than half of the doctors who specialized in the strike opposed the strike after a new vote, but there are many words against. The government identified the legitimacy of the re-election after the first rejection, and internally, the delegates of the Emergency Response Committee expressed their resignation.
According to the Emergency Response Committee of the Korean Medical Association on the 31st, starting at 10:00 p.m. on the 29th, the representatives of each training hospital specialized in the agenda of “adoption of an agreement and suspension of the group action “. The first voting agenda was not the previously known “ whether the strike will continue or not ”, but the content of a presumption for the panmedical group that it would accept the unified agreement between the medical community and stop group actions such as the group exit.
As a result of the vote, there were 49 votes in favor of the adoption of the agreement and suspension of the collective action, 96 votes against and 48 abstentions. It was rejected because it did not exceed a majority of 97 votes. Subsequently, the agenda for “Adoption of the agreement and suspension of the group’s action” was proposed under the authority of the non-commissioned president and a vote was taken again.
As a result, there were 39 votes in favor, 134 votes against, and 13 abstentions. The votes against the stoppage of the strike were approved by majority to maintain the strike. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare expressed regret at the decision that the mayor’s strike would continue, noting especially that the voting process was unfair. The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare said: “It is difficult to understand the group’s decision to continue leaving the group by annulling the result of the vote that was rejected in the continuation of the strike.” Said.
“The (first round of voting) was not decided on whether to continue the group action as reported by the government or the media,” the Daejeon Cooperative’s non-competition committee said. “The agenda was abolished because neither party surpassed the majority on whether to suspend the group action. The government’s claim that it was forced to vote again is not true.”
Conflicts arose over the voting process and results even within the non-capitalists. Some delegates who participated in the non-confrontational vote expressed their resignation and pointed out problems in the process of gathering opinions.
In fact, the doctors who requested anonymity said in an email that “most of the non-subcommittees wanted to stop the strike for the sake of public health and the interests of the elderly as a compromise”, and “we urgently vote without explanation Enough about the deal. ” .
This agreement was signed by the Korean Medical Association and the Hospital Council for Medical Education and Training, and contains the content of establishing an advisory body composed of the government with the medical community within the National Assembly and re-discussing it from the origin.
“The government has always adhered to the position that it cannot stipulate the word ‘origin’ or a whole new discussion when proposing an agreement,” said the Daejeon Cooperative Committee. did.
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
