[ad_1]
Check-in 2020.05.10 18:33
The | Review 2020.05.10 18:53
Itaewon’s crown spread …
◇ Parents are asked to choose whether to go to school or not
On day 7, the Ministry of Education decided that it was considered as an off-campus experimental learning, even if the students did not go to school due to “home learning” when the infectious disease response stage was “severe” or “limit”. In the meantime, I was able to use the suburban experience learning only for field experiences and family trips. Therefore, the educational community said: “The Ministry of Education really allowed the option of attending school.”
However, on the same day, the infection from the home community, which had not occurred for three consecutive days, has resurfaced, and over the weekend, the parents’ demand to “fully guarantee the right to go to school” has intensified. This is because, in the case of home learning approved by the Ministry of Education, it can be used for approximately 2 weeks per year by school board or school. One parent said, “Isn’t there a high school student brother in his 20s who has gone to the Itaewon club?” “If I have a group infection after I finish studying outside of school, should I cry and send my son to school with mustard?” I am concerned if I should be absent. “
In fact, there have been reports that the National Blue House Petition either guarantees the right to attend school or delays the opening of the school. After the last 7 days, ‘3rd high school vs. 13th, opposition to elementary school 1 or 2 years (3020 students agree),’ 1st semester, recognize as online learning attendance (4951 students agree) ‘ , ‘Eunhye Yoo, Minister of Education! (According to 3,793 people), ‘I am requesting the opposite school with reason to attend school. (According to 3,597 people) ‘,’ Change urgent care for kindergartens and nurseries for a fee. Please give me a request (as 858 people agree). On the 24th of last month, the 14,585 people participated in the period “Please postpone the start of classes” to the National Petition of the Blue House.
A petitioner who requested the withdrawal of the Minister of Education, Eun-hye Yoo, said: “His Minister Eun-hye Yoo did not give a reasonable opinion as to why the optional school policy does not apply. Said
“The government” argued “even three days before going to high school
Some experts argue that they will postpone the start of school. Um Jung-sik, professor of infectious medicine at Gil Hospital, Gachon University, said on his facebook on Day 9: “I wanted to see the two weeks after May 5 and then move on to life prevention.” Due to the situation, I think it would be better to postpone school. ”
However, authorities are discussing adjusting the school schedule. On the 10th, three days before attending high school, Eunkyung Chung, head of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a briefing: “The government has not yet decided whether to adjust the schedule to attend the school. We are still discussing the impact on the company, so once the policy is decided, I will be able to speak officially. ”
Originally, the government decided to go to school on the 20th, two weeks later, counting from the 6th, when the “social distance” was changed to “position in life”. However, it was decided to start school on the 13th, a week earlier for the third year, when the university schedule was tight. Some point out that the Ministry of Education’s trial was problematic from the beginning.
A high school principal in Gyeonggi-do said, “Due to the entrance exam, middle school 3 is sent to school early, and if there is even one confirmed student, only students from that school will be disadvantaged in admission this year. Bleed it.