[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ On the 30th, a Korean woman’s phone is reading a statement via a YouTube live stream. | |
| Ⓒ Korean women phone YouTube |
See related photos |
Also, when the Democratic Party expressed its intention to change the ‘Dangheon’ and give a candidate for re-election to the mayor of Seoul and Busan in April next year, the women’s world is protesting.
The Democratic Party announced that from October 31 to November 1, it will vote online for all party members to “nominate candidates for re-election next year by reviewing the party constitution.”
Article 96, paragraph 2, of the Democratic Party Constitution stipulates that “if an elected public official belonging to the party loses his position due to a serious mistake such as corruption, the candidate will not be recommended to the corresponding constituency.” The amendment is added to the current article 96, paragraph 2, with a hint that the opposite can be determined by a vote of the whole party.
Democratic Party representative Lee Nak-yeon told a general assembly of policymakers on the 29th: “Under the Constitution, it is difficult for our party to run candidates for the two by-elections. It is not a responsible option not to nominate candidates. , but to be judged by the citizens through the nomination of candidates. “We have come to the opinion that it is the gift of the responsible public party.”
Rep. Lee said, “Contrary to the pure intent of the regulations, failing to nominate a candidate may unduly limit the choice of voters.” “With the consent of the Supreme Council, party members voted whether to amend the party constitution to open the way for the recommendation of candidates.” I decided to make a decision. “
This party government is one of the ‘innovation proposals’ created by President Moon Jae-in as a representative of the New Democratic Political Union, the predecessor of the Democratic Party, for political reform.
Women’s organization, criticism of the Democratic Party … “Only to recreate power”
Women’s organizations harshly criticized the re-election of the Democratic Party on suspicion of sexual violence in two places when the Democratic Party changed its constitution and expressed its intention to nominate the by-elections.
On the afternoon of the 30th, ‘Joint action for the powerful case of sexual violence of the mayor of Seoul’ and ‘Joint countermeasures for the case of sexual violence of Ogeodon’ <더불어민주당은 '선출직 공직자 성폭력 사건' 반성 없는 당헌 개정 절차 즉각 중단하라>Issued a title statement.
They criticized the Democratic Party’s attempts to amend the party’s constitution, saying: “The existing provisions were the minimum device for party-level reflection and prevention of the repetition of ‘the faults of elected officials'” and “I am angry with this delivery “.
In addition, the Democratic Party has also made efforts to improve the social environment for the return of victims to their daily lives, without fundamental reflection in the case of sexual violence by the elected local head of government, without any prevention of recurrence and Responsible measures, no effort to curb or curb secondary damage, Sin, only shows a rush to recreate power. ”
They said, “I am desperate for the politics of men trying to downplay the issue of sexual violence even after repeating it.”
The Yeo, Se, and Yeon Gender Policy Research Institute condemned the ‘Voting Members’ Proposal’ announced by the Democratic Party on the 29th with a red pencil correction. Yeo, Se and Yeon refuted the argument that “it is not the only responsible option not to nominate candidates”, saying, “What responsible actions have you taken after the sex crimes of the three heads of local governments in Chungnam, Busan and Seoul? “
Next, regarding the sentence that “the victory of re-election is important,” he criticized, “is only the victory of re-election important and is it not important to eradicate sexual crimes?” Furthermore, he pointed out that in the addition of the clause “Voting by former party members”, is it that the responsibilities of the leadership are left to the party members?
 |
|
| ▲ The Gender Policy Research Institute Yeo, Se, and Yeon condemned the “Pall Members Vote Proposal” announced by the Democratic Party on the 29th with a red pencil correction. | |
| Ⓒ Woman. Three. Yeon |
See related photos |
Suhyun Kwon, a scholar, <오마이뉴스>In a call with “Dangheon, the party constitution,” he said, “there must be a considerable process of persuasion and justification. It is because we are going to topple the foundations. Then, intense reflection must precede, but we do not show our willingness to eradicate the sexual violence “. “It was blunt. Sexual violence is not an important issue for them,” he criticized the attitude of the Democratic Party.
Mr. Kwon said: “The nomination for this re-election was a barometer that could confirm whether the Democratic Party was capable of self-cleaning, but it showed all the cards itself.” “Sem” insisted.
“The Democratic Party, of course, should show a thoughtful gesture by not making a candidate, and even if its position is narrowed, it should have a midnight period.” “In a structure in which ‘calling to power’ itself becomes the goal of politics, politicians cannot function,” he emphasized.
