[ad_1]
The appeal of the stepfather, who raped the stepdaughter for 11 years, and the mother who did not block her but participated in the crime, was dismissed.
Stepdaughter Sexual Assault Accusations Against Stepfather and Mother-in-Law Appeal
“The guilt is very serious. The victim suffered extreme.”
The First Criminal Division of the Busan High Court Changwon Court (Director Jin-seok Kim) appealed to stepfather A (52), who was sentenced to 25 years in prison at the first trial for 11 charges, including special quasi-rape, quasi-kinship rape and rape of minors under 13 years of age. On the 3rd it was announced that he had rejected the He also maintained a sentence of 12 years in prison for his mother B, 53, who committed a crime with Mr. A.
Mr. A sexually abused his stepdaughter, who was 10 years old at the time, in 2006 at her home in Gyeongnam, saying: “Dad can touch his original daughter.” In 2007, he is accused of raping his daughter while his wife B was watching at their home.
In 2012, he made or harassed his daughter, who was a high school student, in a car that took her to school. In this way, A is accused of sexual assault 13 times until 2016, when his stepdaughter became an adult. It was revealed that Mother B did not stop her husband’s crimes, but instead participated together and sexually abused her daughter several times.
The stepdaughter became an adult without knowing that the behavior of her parents who raised her was a crime. Even after becoming a college student in 2015, the sexual assault continued, and in 2016 she even underwent abortion surgery. After that, Ms. A came to an investigative agency with the help of her acquaintances.
The parents who were handed over to trial denied the crime, saying: “There is no evidence other than the daughter’s statement, and it is difficult for other families to commit the crime without knowing it due to the structure of the house.” The stepfather, in particular, had sex six to seven times by arrangement after the daughter became an adult, but denied the charges, claiming she had never been forcibly raped.
However, the first court paid attention to the fact that the victim’s daughter had not been cared for by her parents while she lived in a nursery with her grandfather as a child. If they were abandoned by their parents again, the fear of having to return to shelters, etc., would have caused them to be psychologically subjected to their parents.
The court also found that the daughter’s statements made by the protection agencies were specific and consistent. It was judged that it was difficult to believe that there was falsehood in the statement that consistently revealed the painful facts of the children’s facilities on several occasions. The daughter’s acquaintances also stated that they had seen or heard that the victim’s body was generally bruised, or that they had been abused and assaulted by a stepfather.
The first court of first instance said: “Although A has the duty and responsibility to protect and care for him so that he can grow adequately as a protector, he abandoned this duty and committed the crime in this crime against humanity.” “The mother even easily aided her husband’s crime. She stated the reason for the sentence.
The stepfather and mother appealed. They claimed that they did not engage in acts such as harassment or adultery using the victim’s psychological inability to protest, but claimed that the victim had sex in accordance with the agreement between six and seven times after becoming an adult.
However, the Court of Appeals said: “The victim belatedly realized that she had suffered a sexual assault and, belatedly, learned of the victim’s sexual assault. He dismissed the appeal and said: “I suffered extreme pain that my life was denied.”
Changwon = Reporter Sungwook Wi [email protected]
[ad_2]