[ad_1]
In the midst of the conflict between the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, a disciplinary vote is underway by the access reporters of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office to OhmyNews, which released the alleged document of the ‘Inspection of the Judge’. Attention is drawn to the results of disciplinary action such as suspension of access.
This document is part of the evidence released on the afternoon of the 26th when Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol filed an administrative complaint requesting that the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, cancel the exclusion of the attorney general’s duties.
Attorney Wan-gyu Lee, President Yun’s attorney, filed President Yoon’s administrative lawsuit in administrative court on the afternoon of that day, and then delivered a total of 9 pages of the “ Major Cases Judicial Division Analysis of Public Security ” anonymously to the Access Reporter to the Office of the Supreme Prosecutor. This is the document that this attorney presented to the court as evidence.
“I don’t think it’s a temple at all,” Lee said. Let’s leave it to the judgment of the common sense of the general public. “
This document was prepared by Prosecutor Sung Sang-wook, Head of the 2nd Criminal Division of the Goyang District Prosecutor’s Office, Uijeongbu District Prosecutor’s Office in February, under the Investigative Information Policy Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office . Information such as the origin of the judges, peculiarities, opinions and important decisions was included. After the report, the question continues as to whether the document is a judge’s inspection document.
OhmyNews published the full document on the afternoon of the 26th. The problem was that the conditions for reporting the document did not include the document as a photograph. It is possible to write an article using the document, but please understand that it is possible to take a photo of the document and report it as is. OhmyNews published the document taking pictures.
Oh My News says “[전문] ‘No presence’ … ‘Easy to respond to the accusation’ … All the documents were published under the title “Disclosure of documents for illegal judges”. Reporters from the Great Swordsman reported this as “remove embargo” and entered the disciplinary process.
The head of the OhmyNews legal team announced his apology to reporters and said that disciplinary action would follow. Currently, OhmyNews keeps its full text, but replaces the photographic material of the article with graphic data.
On the afternoon of the 27th, the reporters of the great swordsman expressed their displeasure at the coverage of this magazine, saying: “The results have not been released and a disciplinary vote is currently taking place.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
