[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Kim Nam-guk, member of the Democratic Party. The photo shows an investigation that was carried out at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of October 26 at the Ministry of Justice, the Supreme Court, the Auditor, the Constitutional Court and the Auditor General of the Ministry of Legislation. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
On the 9th, the Justice Party made a comment publicly criticizing Democratic Party member Kim Nam-guk. On the other hand, Congressman Kim refuted that the Justice Party is a “red battlefield.” What the hell is?
The day before, the Legislative Judicial Commission of the National Assembly held a public hearing on the abolition of abortion (cessation of pregnancy). At this meeting, Democratic Party member Kim Nam-guk (Gyeonggi Ansan Dan-eul) told Kim Jeong-hye, a researcher at the Korea Women’s Policy Institute, who spoke as a statement: “Abortion It was a problem only for women in the past. “You have to feel responsible,” she asked, “Is there any insight and awareness on the evaluation of men and the crime of abortion?”
Justice Party “Kim Nam-guk’s pain … There must be reasonable measures”
Justice Party spokesman Jo Hye-min criticized in a briefing on the afternoon of the 8th, saying: “The conversations in the public hearing were not the reality of women.” She did not address Rep. Kim Nam-guk directly, but stipulated her comments as “abolition,” saying, “I understand women’s objections to abolishing abortion crimes, but what do men think?”
However, on the 9th, Jeong Ho-jin, the Justice Party’s chief spokesman, also attacked Representative Kim Nam-guk once more. He said, “Representative Nam-guk Kim made a protest call to spokesperson Cho Hye-min last night.”
“It is not common sense to call the spokesperson for the legislative party around 6 pm yesterday and condemn it as a distorted report. It is said that it will not help the party of justice, such as the enactment of the law of punishment. It is an obvious mischief that it is difficult to believe that a member of the ruling party is a member of the ruling party.
Then Chief Spokesman Jeong urged Congressman Nam-guk Kim to apologize and urge the leaders of the Democratic Party to take strict action. “If reasonable action is not taken, we will respond, including legal action,” he added.
Nam-guk Kim “I made a mistake and commented like this …”
However, Representative Kim Nam-guk said, “I am the one who should receive an apology.” In a phone call with him, he said, “I haven’t said any of that. (Spokesperson Cho Hye-min) is in a situation where I have to apologize for my misrepresentation, but I have no intention of doing that. He did.
“There are only a few legislators from the Democratic Party who participated in the Justice Party’s Severe Business Accident Penalty Act, and I am the first to participate and help. The crimes of abortion (public hearing) had to do with abolition It’s amazing to do it this way. “
Representative Kim said, “I like the Justice Party, and I respect both Shim Sang-jung and Roh Hoe-chan, but I really don’t think this is so.” He said on Facebook the day before: “I express great regret for the Justice Party’s comment” and “It completely distorted the intention of the person asking. What is different from Chosun Ilbo in this comment?”
