The Democratic Party stepped up on Lee Nak-Yeon



[ad_1]

Since the beginning of the new year, Nak-yeon Lee, the leader of the Democratic Party, and Lee Myung-bak, Park Geun-hye, have advocated for the pardon of two former presidents and face backlash from within and outside the party. Furthermore, the Democratic Party proposed as a condition that public reflection and consensus of the parties precede, but this is also controversial. This is because it can raise the question of whether it is acceptable to forgive the older brother if he meets the conditions for bribery, corruption and corruption.

Lee Nak-yeon, representative of the Democratic Party, said: “This is the last year that President Moon can work and I thought he should solve this problem in a timely manner.” I am going to make a suggestion without any pros or cons.

Opposition has emerged not only from the people but also within the party. There were voices saying they would stop supporting Lee. With the wind against public opinion, the Democratic Party held the Supreme Council meeting in private on the 3rd and organized party reflection and public consensus as prerequisites. On the morning of the 4th, Kim Young-bae, head of the political affairs office of the Democratic Party (representative), said in an interview with MBC radio ‘The attention of Kim Jong-bae’ on the morning of the 4th, regarding with the Supreme Council the day before, “First, in terms of dealing with this issue in a more orderly and responsible way, first, the sincerity or loyalty of CEO Lee I quite understand. Second, since public consensus is important and there are parties, it is sincere reflection of the parties is important. Third, we gather opinions to promote reform and integration in a forceful and orderly manner at the same time. “

▲ On the morning of January 1, the first day of the new year, Lee Nak-yeon, the representative of the Democratic Party, leaves the memorial tower after finishing a visit to the National Cemetery in Dongjak-gu, Seoul.  Photo = French Democratic Party Home Page
▲ On the morning of January 1, the first day of the new year, Lee Nak-yeon, the representative of the Democratic Party, leaves the memorial tower after finishing a visit to the National Cemetery in Dongjak-gu, Seoul. Photo = French Democratic Party Home Page

In fact, at a meeting of the Supreme Council on the morning of the 4th, Yang Hyang-ja, together with the member of the Supreme Council of the Democratic Party, said: “Important issues such as the amnesty of two former presidents, the indictment of the attorney general and the law of corporate punishment for severe disasters must be viewed from the common sense of the public. ” It is possible when the discussion is mature enough to be done ”, he criticized. Both members of the committee said: “It is not only said that we are talking only about political power. The first and second thing we have to fear is the people.” We must not confuse impatience with urgency ”.

On the same day, the leading Democratic Party member with Park Seong-min appeared on KBS radio ‘Kim Kyung-rae’s Strongest Current Affairs’ and said, “I’ll do it right away, and it wasn’t like this part … He pointed out that it was an issue that had to be discussed at some point. ”He also noted that there are some parts inappropriate for further discussion on this part without the public consensus and reflection of the parties.

However, on the 14th, when former President Park Geun-hye confirmed his sentence, Park said, “There will be various political pressures on President Moon, and in the process, President Nak-yeon Lee predicts all the trials. He explained: “I think it has come out in such a way that it will be hit by an arrow.”

However, questions arise as to whether national integration is possible only by forgiving the two former presidents, whether it is possible to forgive the two former presidents, whether it is possible to forgive them if they reflect on them, and whether party representatives can do whatever they want without win the sympathy of the party.

Representative Kim Young-bae (the head of the Democratic Party’s Office of Political Affairs) said: “It is not one of many initiatives, it is not the core of the path to unification.” “There is inviolability within the party, there is a premature theory and an inevitability,” he said. When asked, ‘Isn’t there a consensus within the party in addition to the consensus of the people?’, Representative Kim said, “Then, I will make an effort to ensure a greater consensus within the party and the people.”

The day before, when asked how the Supreme Council had concluded whether to suggest a pardon or observe the situation, Representative Kim said: “There will be many opportunities in the future, so let’s lead the process of public discussions together in an orderly manner. Answered.

On the morning of the 4th, Ho-Young Joo, the National Power of People’s Power, said at the meeting of the Emergency Response Committee on the morning of the 4th: “I had a hint that it would be an opportunity when Lee announced that he would suggest an amnesty. “. He insisted. Joo Nae’s representative said, “If you buy the swords because they are in power, you should not use them politically or play with forgiveness.”

In this regard, Kim Young-bae, a member of the Democratic Party, refuted: “There was something that (the main representative of the hospital) claimed to be innocent and asked for an amnesty, but it is a bit wrong.”

Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.




[ad_2]