[ad_1]
Furthermore, Yoon Mi-hyang and the controversy that started with the conflict between the elected leader of the Citizen Party and the Japanese victim of comfort women, Lee Yong-soo, are rapidly spreading to the countryside and ideological conflict. In 2015, the controversy over whether or not the comfort women agreement between Korea and Japan was preliminary, and the controversy over donations began to be sparked by the confrontation of “pro-Japanese versus anti-Japanese” and “progress versus conservative ” As the controversy spread beyond the essence of the problem, some voices feared it would spread as the “landslide” that brought Korean society to severe division last year.
On the 12th, President-elect Yoon defined the cost of studying abroad for children and representing the Justice Memory Association (Juie Yeon Yeon) as “the controversial press created by the conservative media and the future unification party to satiate the truth of women’s comfort and apologizing to Japan. ” Furthermore, the Democratic Party said: “The latest offensive by the pro-Japanese, anti-human rights and anti-peace forces.”
“Don’t forget to put pressure on the media about UCLA college students in the United States where your daughters attend,” Yoon Dang-in wrote on Facebook. He said: “We will confront the unificationist party that has not apologized for the negotiations by the comfort women and the pro-Japanese media that did not abandon slavery.” The stronger the pro-Japanese attacks, the greater the resolve towards peace and human rights. “Yoon Dang-in, who has been avoiding media contact for a while, is expressing his willingness to break in every day as the ruling party organizes the air flow to cover itself.
In the Democratic Party, there have been voices from around the world who have expressed concern about President-elect Yoon through the conservative movement against the liquidation of pro-Japanese corruption. Democratic Party leader Kim Doo-gwan said: “Doesn’t he intend to prevent the Moon Jae-in government from destroying the humiliating consolation agreement signed by the Park Geun-hye regime?”
Representative Song Young-gil also said, “I look back at Yoon’s election, who is under attack by pro-Japanese-entrenched forces, and again confirm that pro-Japanese liquidation and independent merit Yewoo are both sides of the coin”. There was also a proposal to encourage Jeong Yeon Yeon’s support by sending a donation to the news that Jeong Yeon Yeon’s supporter is falling.
On the other hand, the United Party and the Future Korean Party raised their offensive positions towards Yun Dang-seon and Jeong Yeon-yeon. Yu Yu-cheol, the representative of the Korean Party, said: “If Jeong Eui-yeon is unsure, he should disclose details such as details of donations and expenses.” South Korean Party spokesman Cho Soo-jin said: “There will be many people who have gathered” the morning that reminds me of former Minister Jo while he saw President-elect Yoon. “
The parties in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Korea also agreed to create a joint task force (FT) to investigate the truth of Jeong and Yeon-in Yoon’s suspicion. By the time the comfort women agreement was reached between Korea and Japan, she elected President Tae-yong Cho, who was the first deputy director of the Blue House National Security Office, and elected grandfather Yoon Joo-kyung. , the oldest daughter of Dr. Yoon Bong-gil. President-elect Yun appears to have been listed in response to the “pro-Japanese” passport framework.
However, there are voices concerned that this is not a faction-triggered issue. Professor Lee Joon-han, from Incheon University’s Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, said: “I am concerned that the reckless revelation around the women’s comfort consensus will damage the legitimacy that the Korean government has maintained in the relationship between Korea and Japan. “
There is also a request to end the controversy by transparently disclosing the details of use of the donations collected by Grandmother Lee Yong-su and Yoon Dang-in. Professor Jang Young-soo of the University of Korea Law School noted that “it is not an attitude of public officials that President-elect Yoon does not fully disclose the allegations.”
Reporter Kim Na-rae and Lee Sang-heon [email protected]
[ad_2]
