[ad_1]
In the fourth audit of the Steering Committee of the National Assembly of the Blue House, members of the opposition and opposition parties exchanged old castles from the beginning. The power of the people sparked the Democratic Party backlash when the Democratic Party revised its constitution to nominate the Seoul-Busan by-election for mayor and presidential responsibility for the conflict between the prosecution and the government.
Representative Kim Jong-jae called the by-elections for the mayors of Seoul and Busan scheduled for next year “the so-called ‘sex crimes by-elections.” The late Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon and the former Busan Mayor Oh Geo-don were signaling retirement after being suspected of sexual violence. Representative Kim said, “In the past, when an elected public official made a serious mistake in Moon Jae-in’s past, he lost his position and created an un-nominated innovation plan when he enforced the rehabilitation. President Moon said that this is the starting point of political development and that if the innovation proposal is rejected, he will take over as representative. At that time, the chairman of the innovation committee, Kim Sang-gon, was the former Minister of Education, and the former Minister of Justice Cho Kook was also a member of the innovation committee. “The innovation proposition that he boasted so much about was scrapped overnight by Lee Nak-yeon. Despite this, President Moon and former Minister Cho Kook remain silent for some reason. “
Representative Kim said, “Whenever there is an unfavorable moment, I change my words or position as if it were the moment. That’s why he insisted that I listen to the ‘Ip Jinbo’. At the same time, he asked President Roh Young-min, the head of the presidential secretary: “Do you think it is correct for the Democratic Party to present a candidate for the by-elections of the mayor of Seoul and the mayor of Busan?”
Then the Democratic Party lawmakers raised their voices and said: “Is this the Democratic Party’s audit of the state administration?”, “Ask a question as a question”, “Ask a question to the state administration of the Blue House “,” (Questions) to the party representative “. In the case of Democratic Party lawmaker Moon Jeong-bok, he asked the boss of Roh Young-min’s boss to “not respond.” The investigations could only continue after Kim Tae-nyeon, chairman of the governing body of the Democratic Party, calmed lawmakers.
After the commotion, Representative Kim Jong-jae said: “(In the midterm elections), handing out candidates is an obvious secondary assault on the sexual assault victims in Park Won-soon and Ogeo-don. He asked for a response.
Chief Secretary Roh Young-min replied: “We try not to divulge our position as much as possible because of the political dispute between the ruling party and the opposition parties,” but Representative Kim criticized that “again there is silence selective”. “This is another secondary offense against the victim. The Blue House always responds selectively. If the president has the will, there are no words or instructions that cannot be said. “President Moon does not speak out against the conflict between Minister of Justice Chu Miae and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. There was no news about Park Won-soon or Eui-yeon Yoon Mi-hyang’s sexual harassment case. “The selective silence and the comments are disappointing to many people and inflict secondary offenses on the victims.”
In an earlier investigation, Ho-Young Joo, the National Power of People’s Power, argued that the maintenance of the Democratic Party by Justice Ministers Choo Mi-ae and other ministers violated political neutrality or fairness. “The Prime Minister, the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Public Administration and Security are all members of the Democratic Party. “Is it fair to end the elections and deal with the electoral criminals?”
“The Moon Jae-in administration was described as the ‘government of the Democratic Party’ when it was inaugurated. It is a good way for the government to cooperate quite closely with each other for responsible policy. “I don’t think it’s a big problem whether or not the party member (of the minister) is kept. When it comes to the Cabinet Accountability System, of course, since party incumbents participate in the cabinet, I think it’s not about the celebration of the party, but about how fair and just the execution is done. “
After hearing this, Won Nae Joo said, “I heard that Minister Choo Mi-ae spoke to Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol that he could not maintain political neutrality.” It was criticized as “comedy”. “There is a saying that a buried dog is a buried dog tree, but would it at least give people a sense of justice if they gave up the party?” He emphasized the theme of holding a party.
However, Mr. Roh did not change his position and said: “There may be differences in interpretation.” Regarding Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s appearance as a prominent opposition chairman in a recent series of public opinion polls, “I know that Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol publicly requested to be removed from the public opinion poll. Probably, I think President Yoon himself will feel embarrassed and ashamed. “
The legislators of the Democratic Party criticized the inquiries of members of the Popular Power. The representative of the Democratic Party, Lee So-young, said: “Before the elections, Ho-young Joo said that the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Public Administration and Security and the Prime Minister should not be members of the Democratic Party, and if neutrality is important. ” Isn’t it a logical contradiction to ask the president and the Blue House to express their position on the nominations for the by-election of a specific political party? The fact that the Blue House believes that it should answer for itself is contradictory ”.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
