[ad_1]
On the morning of the 6th, the children attend school at an elementary school in Seoul. 2020.11.6 / News1 © News1On the 6th, primary school care workers across the country launched a general strike demanding that local governments stop discussing the transfer of care work and improve treatment, and mixed reactions are emerging among parents.
While there is strong criticism that dedicated care professionals who care for difficult-to-care-for students at home rather than their guardians, use the students as hostages for profit, but support that the quality of care Care can deteriorate if the local government becomes the main body of the care class. Opinion also comes out.
The caregivers said that the group action on this day has the nature of a ‘warning strike’, and that if there is no progress in the negotiations with the education authorities later, they will carry out a ‘second strike’, so that the educational community resolves the conflict over face-to-face care. The voice is also growing.
According to the National Union of Non-regular School Workers, the National Office of Education and Public Services and the National Union of Women Workers, an estimated 6,000 solidarity workers participated in the strike in some 2,500 schools in 17 cities and provinces across the country. . It’s half of the 12,000 full-time caregivers. If you look at Seoul alone, 187 out of 577 public elementary schools (33.6%) participated in the strike at 11:00. Of the 1,794 people who participated in the solidarity strike, 429 (23.9%) were. As a result, a temporary vacuum in school care has been created and voices are being raised among parents who send their children to care class, including dual-income families, to confess to caregivers that they took the strike.
Mr. A (43, female), a father who sends his first and third grade children to a primary school in Yangju, Gyeonggi province, said: “Older children have to stay home because they don’t have classes at the school and young children have to come for lunch. I think I can figure it out, but I’m sorry to see the strike. ”
Mr. B (40 years old, female), father of a second grader in Gimpo, Gyeonggi-do, said: “The school said that the school operates the care class normally until Wednesday (4th). He said: “I couldn’t say that I was going to give the company an annual license, so I called my mother.
Even in the online space, there are lines of articles that contain uncomfortable feelings about the care strike. It ranges from content that she had trouble because she couldn’t find a place to drop off her son due to a sudden strike, to reactions that the demands of dedicated caregivers to change the type of full-time job are unreasonable.
On the other hand, “it seems that they are opposed to the transfer of the care management entity to the local government. From the perspective of children who are consumers, I do not want to curse because I think it is better to receive public attention in school like now. (Figure ****) “If the attention is shifted to a local government, the quality can be degraded because it is entrusted to a consignment company. If caregivers are treated better, it will be good for children ”(love ****).
On this day, the non-regular school meeting held a strike competition in Gangwon, Gyeonggi, Gyeongbuk, Gwangju, Daegu, Seoul, Sejong, Ulsan, Incheon, Jeonnam, Jeonbuk and Jeju, and stopped discussing the transfer of care classes from primary school to local government. And a change from full time to a full time caregiver. In front of the Ministry of Education of the Sejong Government Complex, approximately 400 people gather to hold a large-scale assembly.
The group said: “If we ignore the anxious warnings of the caregivers, the second strike will be even greater. If we show trust and hope through sincere negotiations, we will rush back to our children.”
(Seoul = News 1)
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.
