Supreme Prosecutor “The announcement of the Ministry of Justice slandered the attorney general … It is difficult to understand”



[ad_1]

News1 © News1

On the 18th, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office rebelled against the Ministry of Justice’s announcement about the Lime Asset Management case, saying, “It is not based on any fact and is a defamatory scheme against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol.”

The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said in a statement on the afternoon of that day, “President Yoon ordered a comprehensive investigation into the entire investigation of the ‘Lima case’. In particular, the ‘political suspicion related to the opposition’ ordered a thorough investigation. upon receipt of the report. Consequently, an investigation is still ongoing. “

“The ‘prosecutor’s suspicion’ was first recognized through media reports on the 16th, and he immediately ordered the Southern District Prosecutor’s Office to investigate Kim Bong-hyun and other swift and thorough investigations. On the 17th, I reordered taking into account the materiality of the matter ”.

Furthermore, he explained, “The selection of the prosecutor for the investigation of the Lime case is basically a matter for the South District Prosecutor’s Office. “Despite the fact that President Yoon ordered a thorough investigation of the allegations, the content of the announcement of the Ministry of Justice to the contrary was not based on any fact,” he criticized, saying: “It is no different from a defamatory plan against the Prosecutor General and difficult to understand. ” Earlier, the Justice Ministry said on the 16th that it had confirmed that the prosecution had not fully investigated abuses by opposition politicians and prosecutors as a result of inspecting the revelations of former Star Mobility chairman Kim Bong-hyun through a handwritten statement.

Furthermore, the Ministry of Justice said: “Although President Yoon was directly involved in the selection of the investigating prosecutors for the Lime case and in the thorough investigations several times, the suspicion that he did not conduct a thorough investigation of the politicians and prosecutors of opposition, unlike passport staff, even after receiving specific reports of misconduct. Relevance cannot be ruled out, “he said.” We are reviewing the subject and method of the investigation separately from the ongoing prosecution, taking into account the results of the investigation so far and the content of the allegations of misconduct. “

Kim Jin-ha, Donga.com reporter

Close the window

Recommended itemSupreme Prosecutor “The announcement of the Ministry of Justice slandered the attorney general … It is difficult to understand”Best Recommended News

[ad_2]