[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae answers a question from lawmakers at the plenary session of the Legislative Judicial Council held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 5th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Minister of Justice Chu Miae : “There are many ongoing investigations at the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office. There are many investigations overnight. But there is a front-line story that the investigation team is suffering because (at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office) the special activity fee (special activity fee) is not sent. “
(syncopation)
Yoo Sang-beom, Representative of the People’s Power : “The central district attorney’s office had no special expenses, but according to my confirmation, it is already going down.”
Chu Miae : “It means that it is because I heard the complaints of the first line, but I also have no way to verify it.”
On the afternoon of the 5th, the issue of the budget review of the Legislative Judicial Commission of the National Assembly was illuminated with the expenses of special activities of the Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. It was said that 8.4 billion won from the special spending budget of the Ministry of Justice is being executed by the Grand Prosecutor’s Office, but unlike certain business expenses, it is a story that the usage history cannot be understood because it is somewhat free from the procedure. test.
Chu Miae “The relics of the old sword” -Kim Do-eup “Suk-yeol Yoon’s enthusiasm”
Minister Chu also argued that this special activity fee was not assigned to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, which had been in conflict with the Great Swordsman, for the purpose of discrimination in budget execution through the mouth of the ` “ frontline research team ”. After the dispute, the Judicial Committee decided to directly verify the documents, including the details of expenses for special activities within the jurisdiction of the judicial committee, including the Great Swordsman. The method appears to be for members of the ruling judiciary and the opposition to visit the great sword directly early next week.
Suspicion of ‘Suk-Yeol Yoon’s’ special acting expenses brought the fate of the ruling Democratic Party. Representative So Byung-cheol, who was also a prosecutor, said in a morning investigation: “I heard strange rumors” and said: “It means that the allocation of special execution costs for the great sword is at the discretion of the attorney general. Did.
In the afternoon, Congressmen Jong-min Kim and Yong-min Kim lit a fire. Representative Kim Jong-min asked, “Will you randomly execute the 8.4 billion won cash amount without processing the receipts?” Minister Chu said, “Such concerns can be said to be serious,” he said. “It remains an ancient artifact only in the Great Sword.”
Representative Kim Yong-min also raised the possibility of a “crime of embezzlement” based on speculation. Representative Kim said, “If the president is useful or used privately, it would lead to embezzlement, which is a serious problem. Even if it is used as a background, it is not possible to confirm it. “Minister Chu said,” It is difficult to answer because it is domestic, “he said.” People will be perplexed that there is such a corner. I will try to find improvements as soon as possible. “
Hojoong Yun “If the details of the corruption are confirmed, the total amount will be reduced … Document verification decision”
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who resumed the round trip meeting at the National Prosecutor’s Office in eight months, is taking commemorative photos after meeting with local prosecutors at the Daejeon District Prosecutor’s Office on the afternoon of the 29th, 2020.10. 29 | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
The opposition party demanded fact-checking of the auditor’s “big sword special performance expenses”. Representative Kim Do-eup told Auditor General Choi Jae-hyung: “The ruling party takes a leap that can be used to finance the presidential elections because the ruling party is eager to print the attorney general.” Send it. “
Auditor Choi replied: “In the case of special expenses, receipts are possible and testing is difficult due to special circumstances. After requesting an internal control plan, we are requesting an inspection system and an audit if it works.”
Democratic Party lawmaker Song Ki-heon explained, “In the 2020 budget, everyone went to the prosecutor’s office, minus 500 million won (Ministry of Justice) for special expenses related to correctional correction.” Minister Chu said, “Due to the demand for budget transparency, I heard that (most of the special expenses of the Ministry of Justice) have been converted into specific business expenses that are processed as receipts, and the money that I just spent without a receipt has almost been reduced to the great sword. “
Minister Chu also appealed the difficulty of securing the data, saying: “It is impossible to provide data today because the great sword does not cooperate with requests for data from the ruling party lawmakers related to the great sword’s special activities expenses.” .
President Yoon Ho-joong came up with a “reduction in the total amount of special expenses.” President Yoon pretended, “If it is confirmed that the big prosecutors did not cooperate with the data or wrongly executed it, please reduce the total amount of special expenses and increase it to specific business expenses for your examination.”
Finally, after discussions between the ruling secretaries and opponents, it was decided to conclude the debate on the special expenses of execution of the great sword through documentary verification. In addition to the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, it was decided to temporarily verify the special expenses of other organizations such as the Ministry of Justice, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Ministry of Legislation. President Yoon said, “In order to confirm the adequacy of the special expenses allocation standards related to the budget review under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Justice in 2021, we will check the details of the special expenses expenses. If you delegate the date and time time to the president as a method of document verification, we will consult with the secretaries of both parties. “
Representative Baek Hye-ryeon, Secretary of the Judicial Committee of the Democratic Party, <오마이뉴스>In a phone call with him, he said: “We have decided to verify documents, such as the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Justice and Audit,” and “we decided to go directly.”
