[ad_1]
On the 16th anniversary of the April 16 Sewol ferry disaster, families of Sewol ferry victims and April 16 Foundation officials remain silent about the Sewol ferry that was delivered to the new Mokpo port in Mokpo, Jeollanam- do. Yonhap News
At the time of the Sewol ferry tragedy in 2014, the civilian submarines that were injured in the lawsuit filed a lawsuit saying the government’s decision on the level of injuries was incorrect, but was lost in the first instance. According to the court on the 10th, the Seoul Administrative Court Division 5 (Deputy Judge Park Yang-jun) ruled against the plaintiff in a lawsuit against the disposition of an injury class decision by eight civilians, including Mr. A, of the civil submarine.
They participated in the search and rescue of victims from April 16, 2014, the day of the Sewol tragedy until November 11 of the year. It was in August 2016 that they applied for compensation for the relief work. Under the existing Water Rescue Act, compensation was only available if a person suffered a disability due to an injury or injury while conducting maritime search and rescue operations, but since July 2016, modifications have been made to compensate for the injuries rather than physical disabilities.
In response, Haekyung deliberated on his injury class through a subcommittee under the Central Task Force Response Committee, and in November of the same year, notified them of his seventh-grade decision in the Injury Classification Law. After receiving the results, Mr. A said: “At the time of the rescue, the essential decompression procedures and rest were not taken, and the diving was repeated, resulting in avascular necrosis (a disease in which the bone tissue is dying), and he was unable to dive for more than 7 months. However, the reasons for judging the class of injuries were omitted. ”
The trial court dismissed Mr. A’s claim and dismissed the divers’ other seven claims. In March 2017, after A’s objection, the central countermeasure resumed hardship relief work and hospitalization, and in March 2017, Mr. A’s level of injuries increased from 7 to 5, and the amount of compensation has already increased by approximately 64 million won. I saw it as one.
Other civilian subsidiaries said, “We cannot see that there is an error in the content of their relief efforts that may incorrectly determine the level of injury. It was difficult to see that relief work was underestimated or that there were illegal and unfair practices. “” It is recognized that some complainants received hospital treatment, etc. due to the findings of these with acute bone necrosis, which is a type of avascular bone necrosis, “he said.
As a result of entrusting Mr. A’s and others’ medical records to professional medical institutions and the Korean Society for Vocational Medicine, there was little causal relationship between the rescue of the Sewol ferry and the outbreak, and there was a high possibility that Mr. A suffered bone necrosis before rescue. Explained “It is difficult to deny the possibility that the same type of hypertonic bone necrosis has occurred, even if a manuscript with a period of more than 20 years already dedicated to diving operations has not been devoted to rescue activities in Sewol.
The judiciary also noted that the subcommittee of the Central Committee on Countermeasures, in which two specialists in diving medicine participated, did not recognize the causal relationship between hypertonic bone necrosis and rescue activities. It was also mentioned that none of the rescuers had dived longer than they had bone necrosis.
Reporter Lee Byung-jun [email protected]
[ad_2]
