[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ On the 22nd, the CEO held a press conference and announced the results of investigations related to the falsification and alteration of CCTV data on the Sewol ferry and tampering with the DVR collection process. That day, based on the results of the investigation, the committee asked the National Assembly to appoint a special prosecutor. | |
| Ⓒ Provided by the Chief of Staff |
See related photos |
The disinfectant humidifier case and the Sewol Special Disaster Investigation Committee 4.16 (the Special Assistance Committee) requested the National Assembly to appoint a special prosecutor, claiming that the restoration image data from the closed-circuit imaging system (CCTV) presented to the court as important evidence of the Sewol ferry disaster were tampered with. did. Analyzing the video file, it was confirmed that the data was overwritten in 11,5353 places.
On the 22nd, the Special Assistance Committee held a ‘Press Conference Requesting Special Inspection on CCTV Operation for Sewol Ferry Black Box CCTV Operation’ in the conference room on the 18th floor of the Post tower in Jung-gu, Seoul, and affirmed this, saying: “The people who instructed the manipulation by revealing the truth through special prosecution and who were involved are severely punished. I have to.”
On this day, Park Byeong-woo, head of the Sewol Ferry Special Control Committee, explained the results of investigations related to CCTV data falsification and tampering with the DVR (image storage device) collection process. .
Director Park insisted that the image file of the Sewol ferry CCTV restoration presented to the Mokpo branch of the Gwangju District Court was tampered with. It means that the wrong data was copied and overwritten in a part of the normal video file. Due to overwriting, errors occurred in 11,353 locations when playing the video. Director Park explained that the result of a comparative analysis of the data of two ‘judicial contractors’ (company and individual) who restored CCTV images of the Sewol ferry at the request of the court and the CCTV images of the Sewol ferry currently kept by the court , came to this conclusion. .
For example, when analyzing the CCTV video file data sent to the court, the court commissioner sent the sector number ‘3099503185 (group number EC800)’, so the sector number of the video file data that saved should be the same. However, the sector number is shown differently as ‘3099015920 (group number CC800)’ in the same video file data presented by the court commissioner to the audit committee. In other words, someone arbitrarily touched the image data during the restore process.
In particular, Director Park explained that 74% of these bat sectors (physical damage anywhere on the runway) were concentrated in CCTV restoration video files recorded from April 15-16, 2014. However, Director Park said he had not yet confirmed which video was tampered with. It takes more time to technically verify it.
Director Park said: “Most of the data related to the Sewol ferry CCTV data presented to the court has been falsified or altered,” he said. “The remaining evidence related to data manipulation will be transferred to special processing in the future.”
Six years ago the Great Swordsman concluded: “The CCTV tampering allegations are unknown.”
This claim is also a story that reverses the results of the investigation of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office six years ago. In 2014, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office concluded that the suspicion of the closed circuit television operation of the Sewol ferry was ‘unfounded’.
The Great Swordsman played the CCTV video stored on the Sewol Ferry DVR at that time, and the CCTV video of the Sewol Ferry was turned off at 08:30:59 on April 16, the day of the disaster, but the DVR controlling CCTV ran until 8:33:38. An unknown log file (file ‘20140416.alg’) was found, and on suspicion that this three minute parallax occurred because CCTV was tampered with, he announced: “There is no situation where someone has intentionally terminated.”
Furthermore, the suspicion that the end time of the Sewol ferry CCTV video was 18 minutes earlier than the Sewol ferry accident time (around 08:48) was dismissed. At the time, the chief prosecutor said: “The Sewol ferry departure time from Incheon port in the Sewol Ferry CCTV footage is 20:42:10 on April 15, while the Sewol ferry departure time from Incheon port shown on Incheon port CCTV is confirmed as 20:59:42 on April 15 “The time shown on the Sewol ferry CCTV video is 18 minutes earlier than actual time, but not intentionally stopped. “
Director Park also revealed the results of further investigation into the tampering of the DVR collection process. Director Park said: “The DVR was separated from 64 CCTV lines and captured at a different location.” “The video of the DVR collection provided by the Navy was not transmitted by a diver, but by a monitor verifying it on a barge. It was filmed with,” he said.
Data was also presented to refute the claim that the navy had collected the DVR from the information desk on board the Sewol ferry on June 22, 2014. Director Park said he verified the title of the official document, ‘Delivery details after of the DVR Rescue ‘on May 9, looking at the’ State of Completion of Field Command Headquarters Documents’ in Haekyung during the Sewol ferry disaster. However, I could not confirm the details of the document.
“At the time of the disaster, there were 64 CCTV cameras at every corner of the Sewol ferry, so if we picked up the DVR immediately after the disaster, we would have been able to determine the cause of the accident and the last movement of the passengers waiting for the rescue, “Moon Ho-seung said. Manipulated traces were found in all data, including images, and the DVR collection process was also requested for a special inspection as the manipulated evidence was secured. “
 |
|
| ▲ On the 22nd, the CEO held a press conference and announced the results of the investigations related to the falsification and alteration of CCTV data on the Sewol ferry and tampering with the DVR collection process. That day, based on the results of the investigation, the Supreme Court asked the National Assembly to appoint a special prosecutor. | |
| Ⓒ Provided by the Chief of Staff |
See related photos |
The families of the Sewol ferry disaster were angry with the results of Sachaum’s investigation. Jang Hoon, Chairman of the Victim Families Council Operations Committee for Investigating the Sewol Ferry Disaster and Building a Safe Society, said: “(At the time of the Sewol Ferry disaster), CCTV was used to that our survivors could find out the last location of their children first and increase the efficiency of their search. First of all, I proposed (to the government) to pick it up, “he said.” But at the time, the coastal police informed me that they had only recovered closed circuit television just two months after the disaster. “
“The investigation into the truth of the Sewol ferry disaster is asking the state for a duty to protect people’s lives. Our people will not spare the state, the National Assembly and the policies that do not protect people’s lives again.” He emphasized that the request for a special prosecutor was the result of waiting for the blood and bones of our grieving families to shred.
He said: “The National Assembly received a request for a special prosecution from this committee, and the special prosecutor once again strongly demands that the 304 minute victims discover the clear truth without a point.”
