[ad_1]
Members of the Judicial Committee of the National Assembly said on the 10th: “We have obtained a document of the ‘response logic of the son of Chumi-ae’, and this is widely shared with the judiciary of the Democratic Party.” However, the Democratic Judicial Committee responded by saying, “This is the first time I have heard it.”
The power of the people said: “The content of this document is internal data that only the Ministry of Defense and the Prosecutor’s Office know.” It is argued that the Democratic Party or Defense Minister Chu is sharing information that the government considers advantageous.
According to the content of the document released by the power of the people on this day, it is called ‘first interview record (June 2017)’ and ‘education for the prevention of accidents before starting sick leave, and this sick leave received the sick leave required for surgery during treatment at Yangju Armed Forces Hospital. It is said that he has explained what is being done. Who is the subject of the explanation is not recorded, but since it is written as ‘before the start of sick leave’, it is possible that the contents that were directly brought up to Minister Chu’s son were marked as ‘interview records’ said the power of the people.
In addition, the document also states that ‘3rd registration interview (6.30, after returning from vacation): announced its intention to extend the leave before the leave ends. . It appears to contain the content of the education that Mr. Seo returned after returning from two sick leave and a personal vacation. In this regard, the power of the people raised the possibility that the content of the investigation by the government was filtered through passports, saying: “So far these records of the first and third interviews have not been revealed.” Until this document, only the ‘second interview’ of June 15 was known, which was between the first and third sessions.
The rest of this document also contains part of the information that suggests the possibility of circulation in the passport. Among the content of the document, he asked: ‘Even if there is no record of personnel orders as claimed by the opposition party, has the normal holidays been processed?’ You have to answer that the usual vacation procedure is correct. A people’s power official said: “The document refers to the issue in the expression of the” opposition party argument. ” It seems likely that the passport provided favorable information from the government and used it as response logic. “
However, in the content of the document, there is also considerable misinformation such as “The rules that apply first to KATUSA soldiers take precedence under USFK regulations” and “It is legal even in light of Army regulations. the Republic of Korea “. Therefore, some observers said: “It is true that it contains exclusive information that only the government can know, but it is likely that the information has been reprocessed by political circles or the prime minister instead of the document written by the government.” Some of the people’s forces said: “The ‘documents’ are floating in politics for two days in a row. As a result, the passport may be spilling negative information that is favorable to them in ‘documents’.”
In fact, a document came out the day before indicating that the couple called the complaints office of the Ministry of Defense to ask about the extension of their son’s vacation. Then Democratic Party lawmaker Seol-hoon said, “Would ministers and couples file a complaint?” And he argued: “The story that ministers and couples filed a complaint could be a reversal that there are no flaws in the vacation procedure.”
The Democratic Party flatly denied any relevance of the document. A member of the Democratic Party judiciary said: “We have not received any data from our party through the defense of Minister Chu or the Ministry of National Defense.” Another judiciary also said: “This is the first time I have heard it.”
